"This is Zim Olson of Zim Mathematics which is my version of Creative Mathematics. I work out of Denver, Colorado USA and all my work is currently available for download from zimmathematics.com with permission posted online to download, copy and share this content of plus 30 years of my authorship.... With my creative methodologies, of cartoons, Math Stories, games, Math Art, poetry etc, I have developed a Mathematically dominant paradigm I term as the Systems and/or Sub Systems as expressed paradigm for all object and/or objects. I continue to mathematically develop open domains with variations of principally expressed open domains or open domain expression outlines . I feel as Mathematicians it is our job to document how any given statement, perception, expression or non-logical expression can somehow be shown to be true... With available principal expression of open domain and open domain outlines this is clearly feasible. Truth as a portion of an object or objects expression or non-expression outline is given. Current knowledge paradigms are shown to consist of partial system expressions that are systemically lacking information and are clearly the source to ALL problems, error, and any so called terminal series. "

According to Zim Mathematics, Mathematics as a viable paradigm must be
develop able AND reducible to any perceived or identified object/objects and their express-able domains. If this is not so, you change the Mathematics and do not ignore the perceived object/objects express-ability. A soulution to this ongoing dilemma of mankind's systemic knowledge reliance may be to incorporate non principal or non lawful state. Lawful states of principal object(s) may give ongoing principal and open domain outcomes?

a work in progress as of February 28, 2015

Systems and/or Sub Systems as Expressed

A Mathematically Dominant Paradigm

Renaissance and now scientific thought use these Systems and/or Sub Systems concepts extensively and thoroughly in their pursuit of knowledge, but this usage has been entirely implicitly and/or explicitly in the recognition of these systems concepts and terms. The renaissance movement owed their success to this recognition, but now Science is doomed to another terminal series as expressed per their own utilized explicit without implicit axioms. Objective, reproducible, and developable or reducible behavior is not sufficient to guarantee a viable knowledge paradigm. Zim Olson's Systems Math again opens the doors for utilization of all these systems concepts as explicit terms. Renaissance thinking is again viable.

Systems and/or Sub Systems as Dominant Mathematical Paradigm. Four Behavioral Components for any Existential System / Object: Every object has a functional context, Every(x); a System and no Sub System functionality Any(x) or f(x); A Non stated functionality, Non(x); and a resultant intersecting functionality, Some(x).

Zim Mathematics describes every object as possessing these behavioral components, including operations, numeric, unknown objects, qualitative or physical object and/or object(s). And that every of these object(s) can be expressed as a System and/or Sub System with varying existential results. Physical, qualitative, time attributes, illness and death are simply a partial system expression.

Pseudo numeric expressions of life object or object(s) or Non-Life object or object(s) may give derivative sources to illness and life system(s) death phenomena. Cures or healing may become readily apparent as the terms or basis for this non-health phenomena or selection / omission categories are revealed.

Unknown operations as complete Systems are said to be also applicable with these numerical values. These expressions are develop-able and reducible within identifiable principal and/or pseudo and/or open domains giving viable knowledge.

A derivation source for Principal System tenets, completely expressed or non-expressed is below, giving Knowledge Source:

Pseudo Systems or “Named” Expression Outline and Construct Source. Pseudo Expression Trees as with Earthly Creation, give selection/omission categories of intelligence processes.

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(1)Any(1)Some(1)Non(1)

Every(0)Any(0)Some(0)Non(0)

________________________

Creative Math

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

________________________

Creativity

This gives the following available Pseudo Objects and/or Principal Expression Object(s):

X, Y, Xx, Yy, Xy, Yx, X0, 0x, X(1+0), X(1,0), XN, X . . . X, A . . . Z, X . . . Y, Xx . . . Xy, X1 . . . X0, X0 . . . Y1, X0 . . . X0, X0 , , , Y0, X(1+0) , , , Y(1+0), X(1,0) . . . Y(1,0), XN . . . Y(1+0), etc !

Expression combinations of these Pseudo and/or Principal outlines represent sources to all contemporary (and otherwise) paradigms of knowledge. Expression combinations of principal numeric objects, 1,0,1+0, 1 and/or 0, as systems reveal expression domain sources that explain contemporary physical expression domains such as for Beginnings, Endings, Series, Terminal Series, Infinite Series, Events, Non-Events, True/False, Success/Failure, Luck/Bad Luck, .... Time, Space, Time/Space Relativity, Gravity, better than the physical sciences have described themselves .. Expression of object and /or objects as some form of exhaustive parameterization construct or "A-Z", could give recognizable and identifiable variations of "E=MC2" expressions.

Pseudo numeric expressions of life object or object(s) or Non-Life object or object(s) may give derivative sources to illness and life system(s) death phenomena. Cures or healing may become readily apparent as the terms or basis for this non-health phenomena are revealed. If you are a die hard statistician and probability theorist there are always principal and/or pseudo numeric expressions one and/or zero with variable pseudo and /or principal open domains or expression domain outlines.

These expressions of course also give our sources to system(s) Logic and corresponding functionalities .

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __, ... __) Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __, ... __) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)

(1,0)Every(X)(Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(__)Any(+)Some(__)Non(__)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Earth-Mankind System giving unique expression outcome for any time expression

Every(1)Any(N)Some(1)Non(1)

or

Every(1)Any(N)Some(1,0)Non(1)

___, ___

___, ___, . . . ___.

_______________________

X

Zim Olson's Existential Synopsis

Non Logic + Zim Mathematics w/ System(s) and Expression Math terms/concepts. Giving additional development in Creative Math Domains is view able under the "Expressions" link.

Expressed 1; 0; 1+0; 1 and/or 0; in various combinations of object or object(s) and as giving various combinations of object or object(s): And these Exhaustive but variable construct(s) expressions of object(s) and/or object that give outcomes of like/combined attribute(s), could give sources to additional principal system logic/tenets & reducible/develop-able principal open domains.

I imagine there will ALWAYS be more explaining to do for a System(s) and/or Sub System(s) as Expressed Paradigm. And in case not noted by reader, this is considered within "open domain(s)". Otherwise I consider this paradigm is fairly well set in "Stone" or at least Zim Mathematics "html". "Open Domain Development" is a future topic of interest for Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics. The recognized domain of Human Intelligence, Expressions of Expressions .... of Expressions, has made Earthly Mathematics of this domain seem untenable. However we do have available recognized Express-ability options such as Expressions of Expressions ....of Expression of Pseudo and/or Principal and/or open Domain(s). Below is one such expression outline in my interest of Mathematical Open Domain development and possible Principal Expression(s) of such outlines.

Every(1)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Any(1)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Some(1)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Non(1)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Any(0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Some(0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Non(0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(1+0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Any(1+0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Some(1+0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Non(1+0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Every(1,0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Any(1,0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Some(1,0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Non(1,0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)

Or

Every(1)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Any(1)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Some(1)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Non(1)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Any(0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Some(0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Non(0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(1+0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Any(1+0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Some(1+0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Non(1+0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Every(1,0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Any(1,0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Some(1,0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Non(1,0)

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Or

Every(1)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Any(1)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Some(1)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Non(1)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Any(0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Some(0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Non(0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(1+0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Any(1+0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Some(1+0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Non(1+0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(1,0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Any(1,0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Some(1,0)

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

As expressed with available mentioned alternative Math Constructs in this web sites

Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics

Creative Math and Art.

New Math Foundations and Logic

Copyright 2015

Share by: