“This is Zim Olson of Zim Mathematics. Zim Mathematics as with Mathematics, is not a philosophy, knowledge, knowledge paradigm, or algorithm giving outcome(s). Most people will find content in these videos that are important to themselves. No PhD of any kind is required to appreciate this content. Although some with higher education may find this content useful. A general appreciation and interest for this type of thought will be most helpful. It is my hope that you all will enjoy this content.”
"This is Zim Olson of Zim Mathematics. Zim Mathematics is my version of Creative Mathematics. I work out of Denver, Colorado USA and all my work is currently available for download from zimmathematics.com with permission posted online to download, copy and share this content of plus 30 years of my authorship.
With my creative methodologies, of cartoons, Math Stories, games, Math Art, poetry etc., I have developed a mathematically dominant paradigm I term as the Systems and/or Sub Systems as expressed paradigm for all object and/or objects
Zim Math explains clearly, contemporary scientific paradigms and their tenets, logic, and concepts better than these disciplines ever will be able explain on their own. I explore also Express-ability or Express-ability Outlines with principal and/or partial and/or open domain expression, or expressions of expressions. I have been working with some success on a Mathematical Non-expression and its importance to Mathematical development.
As is documented throughout history, but ignored by Earthly paradigms, our knowledge of knowledge is shown as systemically lacking information. This has given us origins to our partial system expression or partial system series expression and the recognized kingdom of knowledge with mis-information, mis-truths, false vs. truth paradigms including any so called terminal event or series.
The selection / omission intelligence methodologies commonly used and recognized in our education systems are also shown to be, not useful in producing principal tenets to any knowledge paradigms. Availability of Principal expression provide our source to Principal outcomes / soulutions. Pseudo / partial expression give our source to ALL “problems”. Zim Math provides a pseudo and/or principal and/or open domain measure of rationale…
Now scientific thought use these Systems and/or Sub Systems concepts extensively and thoroughly in their pursuit of knowledge, but this usage has been entirely implicitly and/or explicitly in the recognition of these systems concepts and terms. The renaissance movement owed their success to this recognition, but now Science is doomed to another terminal series as expressed per their own utilized explicit without implicit axioms.
The explicit identification and use of Systems and/or Sub Systems concepts, and expression / non-expression outlines in Zim Mathematics re-opens the doors for knowledge and Humanity behavioral development. Zim Olson's Systems Math again opens the doors for utilization of all the systems concepts as explicit terms. Renaissance thinking is again viable.
Systems and Art Methodologies enable a visualized, viable and axiomatic knowledge/math paradigm. Assignment of system(s) express able values to Humanities recognized behavioral options gives a new Principal 'Horizon' intelligence capabilities. The availability of these express-ability options can also serve as our National Defense deterrent.
Expressing one's self as Principal and/or Partial and/or Open Domain object and / or object(s) seldom fails to make available useful and "additional" information.
Principal and Principal Open Domain expression(s) as principal object and/or object(s) can give us victory capabilities of NO terminal event(s) or series. Viable, useful principal object(s) are evidenced as develop-able and/or reducible within domains of identified expression, expression(s), expression of expression(s), non-expression, non-expression(s), non-expression of non-expression(s) or combinations thereof. Systematic application of principal and/or pseudo and/or open domain object(s) as expression(s)/non-expression(s) give evidence of domains of express-ability. However, expression outcomes are not a reproducible measure or indication of a viable expression paradigm. Principle expression(s)/non-expression(s) of principal object(s) do not give principal outcomes, ie that are develop-able / reducible within recognized expression/non-expression paradigms.
I feel any given statement, perception, expression or non-logical expression can somehow be shown to be true. With available principal expression of open domain and open domain outlines this is clearly feasible. Truth as a portion of an object or objects expression or non-expression outline is given.
I have been presenting and exhibiting this material at Regional and National Math meetings across the country over the past many years… Joint Math Meetings at New Orleans, San Diego, Baltimore, Boston, Atlanta; Math Fest at Washington DC; MAA Regional Meetings at Denver, Ft. Collins, Boulder, Colorado Springs, San Luis, Golden. "