Introduction & Summary Video 
Many Full Length Videos
"Zim Olson" at 
"Zim Math News" on this Page

 Zim Olson's Existential Synopsis
Systems and/or Sub Systems as Expressed
A Mathematically Dominant Paradigm


Explanation of Systems and Sub Systems Concepts 

Four Behavioral Components for any Existential System / Object: Every object has a functional context, Every(x); a System and no Sub System functionality Any(x) or f(x); A Non stated functionality, Non(x); and a resultant intersecting functionality, Some(x).

Historical: These concepts have been used throughout known History. These terms have been to a large extent implicit in our understanding; Theologies, knowledge, knowledge theory, law, businesses and economies. These and other understandings have laid claim to various portions of the system and/or sub system paradigm.

Current Perspective on Systems and Usage: Science utilizes the System functionality portion of this paradigm.  Theologies still utilize this paradigm for a principal system, but do not agree on the existence or content of the behavioral components. 'Earthly' disciplines such as business, government, Information sciences, utilize and recognize the behavioral components but have not come to terms on their existential basis.

Systems and/or Sub Systems as Dominant Mathematical Paradigm:Zim Mathematics describes every object as possessing these behavioral components, including operations, numeric, unknown objects, and qualitative object and/or object(s). And that every of these object(s) can be expressed as a System and/or Sub System with varying existential results. Physical, qualitative, time attributes, illness and death are simply a partial system expression. 

Origin of System Components and Expression Dynamic:

f(1) + - / × => f(0) + - / × => f(1+0) + - / × => f(1,0)= + - / ×

giving this tenet below for any object expressed as a complete System or completely expressed Sub System

g(1) + - / × = g(0) + - / × = g(1+0) + - / × = g(1,0)= + - / ×

Unknown operations as complete Systems are said to be also applicable with these numerical values.

These expressions are develop able and reducible within an open domain and a principal logic

Complete and simultaneous system(s) expression of numeric object(s) one as singular, paired, and multiple objects could give a principal numeric object(s) zero (0)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_, _0_ .
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_, _0_, . .. _0 _




G-d Art

G-d Art

Infinite Series Any

The "Original State"


Omniscience, Omni sapience, Omnipresence for all Object(s) as Expressed


Open Domain Source, Non Expressed


___, ___ .

___, ___, . . . ___ .

Principal Components  Venn Diagram
Principal Components  Venn Diagram


Outline of Expression Variations or Operational Expression Variations


This gives the following available Pseudo Objects and/or Principal Expression Object(s):

X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0), A-Z, =, ≠, +, - , ÷, ×, __, __ __ , __ __ .. __, N, 1-N, 1-∞, and, or, and/or,

Expression combinations of these Pseudo and/or Principal outlines represent sources to all contemporary (and otherwise) paradigms of knowledge. Expression combinations of principal numeric objects, 1,0,1+0, 1 and/or 0, as systems reveal expression domain sources that explain contemporary physical expression domains such as for  Beginnings, Endings, Series, Terminal Series, Infinite Series, Events, Non-Events, True/False, Success/Failure, Luck/Bad Luck, .... Time, Space, Time/Space Relativity, Gravity, better than the physical sciences have described themselves ..  Expression of object and /or objects as some form of exhaustive parameterization construct or "A-Z", could give recognizable and identifiable variations of "E=MC2" expressions.  These expressions of course also give our sources to system(s) Logic and corresponding functionalities.

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __, ... __)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __) 
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __, ... __) = (__)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __) = (__)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)


System(s) Time Expression

Every(__)Any(+)Some(__)Non(__)      Numeric Partial Time System Expression

Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)           Earth-Mankind System

giving unique expression outcome for any time expression


Earth(Men1 and/or Men0)Every(_) Any(+) Some(_)Non(_)

Universe Dice
Universe Dice


Dollar concepts can enhance our Economic modalities

Systems Dollars
Systems Dollars

The Real Uni-Verse 
The Real Universe

The Real Universe


=> As Expressed 
Additional Expression Sources or IQ/Knowledge Sources to Mankind

 Pseudo System(X) Principal System(Y)
 Pseudo System(X) Principal System(X)
Expressed 1; 0; 1+0; 1 and/or 0; in various combinations of object or object(s) and as giving various combinations of object or object(s). Exhaustive but variable construct(s) expressions of object(s) and/or object that give outcomes of like/combined attribute(s), could give sources to additional principal system logic/tenets.


Ruler of the Universe
Ruler of the Universe

Systems  and/or Sub Systems Multiple Pardigms
Systems  and/or Sub Systems Multiple Pardigms

In Conclusion

Zim Olson's Existential Synopsis

I imagine there will ALWAYS be more explaining to do for  a System(s) and/or Sub System(s) as Expressed Paradigm. And in case not noted by reader, this is considered within "open domain(s)". Otherwise I consider this paradigm is fairly well set in "Stone"  or at least Zim Mathematics "html".

"Open Domain Development" is a future topic of interest for  Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics.

Zim Olson at his Desk in October 2012 
Zim Olson at his Desk in October 2012

Share by: