Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics

Creative Math & Art.

New Math Foundations & Logic.

Updated 7/21/2017

“This is Zim Olson of Zim Mathematics. Zim Mathematics as with Mathematics, is not a philosophy, knowledge, knowledge paradigm, or algorithm giving outcome(s). However, some may consider this the only paradigm, so much that it does not make sense to disagree with anyone, simply because Mathematics is the only paradigm.”

“Most people will find content in these videos that are important to themselves. No PhD of any kind is required to appreciate this content. Although some with higher education may find this content useful. A general appreciation and interest for this type of thought will be most helpful. However, in my estimation the Mathematical “Rubber” as represented in Zim Mathematics needs to meet the “Road”, or Humanity will experience a terminal series or event(s) as expressed.”

__________________________________________________

"This is Zim Olson of Zim Mathematics. Zim Mathematics is my version of Creative Mathematics. I work out of Denver, Colorado USA and all my work is currently available for download from zimmathematics.com with permission posted online to download, copy and share this content of plus 30 years of my authorship.

With my creative methodologies, of cartoons, Math Stories, games, Math Art, poetry etc., I have developed a mathematically dominant paradigm I term as the Systems and/or Sub Systems as expressed paradigm for all object and/or objects

Zim Math explains clearly, contemporary scientific paradigms and their tenets, logic, and concepts better than these disciplines ever will be able explain on their own. I explore also Express-ability or Express-ability Outlines with principal and/or partial and/or open domain expression, or expressions of expressions. I have been working with some success on a Mathematical Non-expression and its importance to Mathematical development.

As is documented throughout history, but ignored by Earthly paradigms, our knowledge of knowledge is shown as systemically lacking information. This has given us origins to our partial system expression or partial system series expression and the recognized kingdom of knowledge with mis-information, mis-truths, false vs. truth paradigms including any so called terminal event or series.

The selection / omission intelligence methodologies commonly used and recognized in our education systems are also shown to be, not useful in producing principal tenets to any knowledge paradigms. Availability of Principal expression provide our source to Principal outcomes / soulutions. Pseudo / partial expression give our source to ALL “problems”. Zim Math provides a pseudo and/or principal and/or open domain measure of rationale…

Now scientific thought use these Systems and/or Sub Systems concepts extensively and thoroughly in their pursuit of knowledge, but this usage has been entirely implicitly and/or explicitly in the recognition of these systems concepts and terms. The renaissance movement owed their success to this recognition, but now Science is doomed to another terminal series as expressed per their own utilized explicit without implicit axioms.

The explicit identification and use of Systems and/or Sub Systems concepts, and expression / non-expression outlines in Zim Mathematics re-opens the doors for knowledge and Humanity behavioral development. Zim Olson's Systems Math again opens the doors for utilization of all the systems concepts as explicit terms. Renaissance thinking is again viable.

Systems and Art Methodologies enable a visualized, viable and axiomatic knowledge/math paradigm. Assignment of system(s) express able values to Humanities recognized behavioral options gives a new Principal 'Horizon' intelligence capabilities. The availability of these express-ability options can also serve as our National Defense deterrent.

Human Social ills or diseases can be documented as the product of the unavailability of Principal and / or Partial and/or Open domains express-ability for all object and /or object(s).

AND Expressing one's self as Principal and/or Partial and/or Open Domain object and / or object(s) seldom fails to make available useful and "additional" information.

Principal and Principal Open Domain expression(s) as principal object and/or object(s) can give us victory capabilities of NO terminal event(s) or series. Viable, useful principal object(s) are evidenced as develop-able and/or reducible within domains of identified expression, expression(s), expression of expression(s), non-expression, non-expression(s), non-expression of non-expression(s) or combinations thereof. Systematic application of principal and/or pseudo and/or open domain object(s) as expression(s)/non-expression(s) give evidence of domains of express-ability. However, expression outcomes are not a reproducible measure or indication of a viable expression paradigm. Principle expression(s)/non-expression(s) of principal object(s) do not give principal outcomes, ie that are develop-able / reducible within recognized expression/non-expression paradigms.

I feel any given statement, perception, expression or non-logical expression can somehow be shown to be true. With available principal expression of open domain and open domain outlines this is clearly feasible. Truth as a portion of an object or objects expression or non-expression outline is given.

I have been presenting and exhibiting this material at Regional and National Math meetings across the country over the past many years… Joint Math Meetings at New Orleans, San Diego, Baltimore, Boston, Atlanta; Math Fest at Washington DC; MAA Regional Meetings at Denver, Ft. Collins, Boulder, Colorado Springs, San Luis, Golden. "

System Concepts and Terms

Systems and/or Sub Systems as Expressed

A Mathematically Dominant Paradigm

Systems and/or Sub Systems as a Dominant Mathematical Paradigm, where there are Four Behavioral Components for any Existential System / Object:

- Every object has a functional context, Every(x);
- A System and no Sub System functionality Any(x) or f(x);
- A Non stated functionality, Non(x);
- A resultant intersecting functionality, Some(x).

Zim Mathematics describes every object as possessing these behavioral components, including operations, numeric, unknown objects, qualitative or physical object and/or object(s). And that every of these object(s) can be expressed as a System and/or Sub System with varying existential results. Physical, qualitative, time attributes, illness and death are simply a partial system expression.

The contemporary perspective of the Zim Math Systems and / or Sub Systems paradigm is summarized as follows:

- Theologies recognize the principal components but do not agree on an existential relationship.
- Science and Earth knowledge paradigms utilize the system concepts, but entirely on an implicit and / or explicit, selection or omission basis.
- Information Sciences, Economics, Government also utilize these system concepts thoroughly, but have no sense of an Existential or Principal / Pseudo basis to them.

Partial system numeric expressions of life object or object(s) or identification of the Non-Life object or object(s) behavioral components, may give derivative sources to illness and the life & death system(s) phenomena. Any cures or healing may become readily apparent as the terms or basis for this non-health or non-life behavioral component are revealed, or the selection / omission categories of systems expression are identified.

Origin of System Components and Expression Dynamic:

f(1) + - / × => f(0) + - / × => f(1+0) + - / × => f(1,0)= + - / ×

Giving this next tenet for any object expressed as a complete System or expressed Sub System.

g(1) + - / × = g(0) + - / × = g(1+0) + - / × = g(1,0)= + - / ×

A derivation source for Principal System tenets, completely expressed or non-expressed is below, giving Knowledge Source:

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___, ___.

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___, ___, . . . ___.

Pseudo Systems or “Named” Expression Outline and Construct Source. Pseudo Expression Trees as with Earthly Creation, give selection/omission categories of intelligence processes.

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___.

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___, ___. = ___.

Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___, ___, . . . ___ = ___.

Outline of Expression Variations or Operational Expression Variations

Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)
Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z)

Expression combinations of these Pseudo and/or Principal outlines represent sources to all contemporary (and otherwise) paradigms of knowledge. Expression combinations of principal numeric objects, 1,0,1+0, 1 and/or 0, as systems reveal expression domain sources that explain contemporary physical expression domains such as for Beginnings, Endings, Series, Terminal Series, Infinite Series, Events, Non-Events, True/False, Success/Failure, Luck/Bad Luck, .... Time, Space, Time/Space Relativity, Gravity, better than the physical sciences have described themselves .. Expression of object and /or objects as some form of exhaustive parameterization construct or "A-Z", could give recognizable and identifiable variations of "E=MC2" expressions.

These expressions of course also give our sources to system(s) Logic and corresponding functionalities .

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __, ... __)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __, ... __) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __) = (__)

Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)

There could be sources to Additional Principal Logic / Tenets Expressed as 1; 0; 1+0; 1 and/or 0; that give various combinations of object or object(s). These could give variable construct(s) expressions of object(s) that have like/combine-able attribute(s), giving us sources to additional principal system logic / tenets & reducible / develop-able principal open domains.

I imagine there will ALWAYS be more explaining to do for a System(s) and/or Sub System(s) as Expressed Paradigm. And in case not noted by reader, this is considered within "open domain(s)". Otherwise I consider this paradigm is fairly well set in "Stone" or at least Zim Mathematics "html". "Open Domain Development" is a future topic of interest for Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics. The recognized domain of Human Intelligence, Expressions of Expressions .... of Expressions, has made Earthly Mathematics of this domain seem untenable. However we do have available recognized Express-ability options such as Expressions of Expressions ....of Expression of Pseudo and/or Principal and/or open Domain(s).

Wikpedia states Principal as "an entity that can be identified and verified": Such as Viability in Object(s) or Object(s) Expression, or Expression of Expressions. See Zim Math below.. This Principal object(s) is perhaps the only genuinely identifiable and verifiable entity, humanly recognizable. Subsequent principle applications do not give principal object(s) or outcomes.

Zim Math Definition(s) of Interest

Life/Living:

Object and/ or object(s) Expression of Expression(s) viability

Living G-d:

Identified object and/or objects viability within domains of identified expression, expression(s), expression of expression(s), expression(s) of expression, non-expression, non-expression(s), non-expression of non-expression(s), non-expression(s) of non-expression, or combinations thereof.

Zim Olson and Zim Mathematics

Creative Math and Art.

New Math Foundations and Logic

Denver Colorado USA

Copyright 2017

Share by: