Explanation of Systems and Sub Systems Concepts
(Also See Applications Section)
- Four Behavioral Components for any existential
system/object: Every object has a functional context,
Every(x); a System and no Sub System Functionality f(x); A Non
Stated Functionality, Non(x); and a resultant intersecting functionality,
Some(x). All this here is said to be self evident and Axiomatic,
based on all experience of object behavior.
- Historical: These concepts have been used throughout known History. But these terms have been to a large extent implicit in our understanding. Theologies, Knowledge and Knowledge Theory, Law, Businesses and Economies. These and other understandings have laid claim to various portions of the system and/or sub system paradigm.
- Current Perspective on Systems and Usage: Science utilizes the System Functionality portion of this paradigm. Theologies still utilize this paradigm to a large extent for a principal system, but do not agree on the existence or content of the behavioral components. 'Earthly' disciplines such as business, government, Information sciences, utilize and recognize the behavioral components but have not come to terms on their existential basis.
- Systems and/or Sub Systems as Dominant Mathematical Paradigm: Zim Mathematics/Zim Olson describe every object as possessing these behavioral components, including operations, numeric, unknown objects and qualitative object/systems. And that every of these objects can be expressed as a System and/or Sub System with varying existential results. Physical or Qualitative attributes are simply a partial system expression.
- Origin of System Components and expression dynamic: f(1)= + - / × (See Below).
An Origin of System Transformation & System Behavioral Components
f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1+0)= + - / × = > f(1,0)= + - / ×.
or in other terms
f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1 and 0)= + - / × = > f(1 and/or 0)= + - / ×.
giving another result:
f(1) = + - / × = f(0) = + - / × = f(1+0) = + - / × = f(1,0)= + - / ×.
Showing permanent tenets of a Principal System.
Thus any statement, observation, relationships, expression or expression
derivation Is/Are contained in, or part of the principal expression. We
are an expression. Any so called "additional" expression, would not
result in additional information. Expression of Expression(s)
would merely result in Non Sysem wide results or Pseudo Systems.
Other modalities of expression maybe available giving other behavioral
alternatives.
See the:
System Sub System Expression
Synopsis
"Omniscience"
The expression of Operations as system objects could be said to give "Omniscience" . Or f(+) gives "Omniscience" . This is a result and consequence of the basic operation "+" expressed as a product of the four system behavioral components and it's products expressed as four system behavioral components resulting in "all knowledge" and all Mathematics.
The Universe and Knowledge (the domain of Sub Systems) could also be said to be a result of this condition and it's expression.
f(x) = + - / * ; A(x) = + - / * ; f(A) = + - / * ; A(Xy) = + - / * ; could all be said to result in portions of this knowledge state. But we will never achieve "Omniscience" with these types of expressions or expressions of partial system constructs or qualitative constructs.
Non Equality Axiom: Every Object modeled as a System or partial system construct with the four behavioral components is said to be unique in terms of its Quantitative and/or Qualitative properties, or it's system functionality.
Theology
f(1,0, Jesus(1,0)) = + - / ×
•Judea - System and Sub System perspective without 4 general behavioral components, particularly in a Principal System.
f(1, Torah(A-Z)) = Every +, Every -, Every / , Every × Any +, Any -, Any / , Any ×
f(1, Mathematicians (1, 0 )) = Any +, Any -, Any / , Any ×
f(1, 0) = + - / × , ie Creative Mathematics Plug in Values and figure out how it works.
Achieving full System and Sub
System Functionality
Any Sub System functionality as expressed simply
as Any(x) = Any(+); or f(x) = Any(+); would not achieve System
and Sub System functionality until the
incorporation of the basic operation Any(-) in the sub system expression
giving Any(x) = Any(+)Any(-) or f(x) = Any(+)Any(-). I use this Shorthand
expression of the basic operation system expressions, omitting Any(/) and
Any(*), because mathematically f(+,-) => f(+,-,/,*) when the operations
are expressed or modeled as systems.
This is to say a created life object mathematically expressed by Any(+)
would be said to not achieve full functionality until expressed by Any(+)Any(-).
The 3 other system components, Every(+), Some(+), Non(+) and Every(-),
Some(-), Non(-) in this expression are implied here.
Explanation of Knowledge Theory found in Book of Genesis of Bible
" Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil"
Is a Sub System Expressed as a System
In the church I attend
New Life Fellowship Foursquare church,
Pastor Joe Olsson spoke of "Ownership" as a key concept in the "Eating of
of the Forbidden fruit" (The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and "Original
Sin" or "The Fall".....Which has led me to the following update on the interpretation
of this Items/Events.
"Ownership" in the "Garden" on Earth could be interpreted as Mankind or
Lifekind taking or expressing objects on Earth such as the "Apple Tree"
as Partial System expression(s) and/or Partial Expression of operation
systems. Thus taking "Ownership" of these objects by omitting these
behavioral components given by a principal system expression. Meaning
Ownership by expressing these objects as lacking behavioral
components, and taking supposed dominion over them, where in reality the
behavioral components were still there. Showing that the "Tree of
Knowledge of Good and Evil" was Mankind's partial product or expression
on Earth and his supposed dominion of them. Supporting again the notion
that Science and Knowledge is principally a Earthly construct or Qualitative
construct (a result of supposed "dominion" of expression by omitting
system behavioral components). Such an expression may be: f(1,0, Mankind(A
Any)) = + - / × .
"Tree of Life"
A Sub System Expressed as part of the Principal
System Components
....Barrier's to the System of the Tree of Life could
be said to be "Dependency" of various forms on the Tree(s) of Knowledge
of Good and Evil. Also, 'illness' and 'Death' could be said to be
attributable to these "Dependencies(s)"
Mathematical f(x) of any object or any qualitative construct is the functional
center of functional intersection of Principal System Components.
The Tree of Life as expressed or originated at: f(1) = + - /
×; could be said to be the same mathematical and functional
source for any object.
Asking a Question or Asking God a Question could be expressed in the following
way for any applied Qualitative Value or Construct:
In the Judeo/Christian Bible, Satan
is referred to as the instigator of all this. You may ask,
Who, what, when, where, why is this figure. I will try to answer this
question in terms of System and/or Sub System partial constructs.
Particularly as it references to existence on Earth. And where does this
existential figure receive all this 'power'? The Solar-Earth System
construct or partial construct that 'feeds' life existence on Earth is what
gives the partial System construct, 'Satan', his 'power'. An expression
for this relationship could be said to consist of the following:
Solar-Earth( X, Man(X)) = -------------- .
Or ....... Solar-Earth( X, Man(X)) = Any(+) .
This expression highlights
man's reliance with the operation and its functional component Any(+) and
it's apparent cause/effect relationship in Mankind's or Lifekind's Solar
"System". Other operational system components are ignored.
Satan is not a person. He also is a partial system/sub system construct,
that can be found in the above expression. Satan could be said to be any
partial expression of the following:
Satan=Every(Solar-Earth) / × Any(Solar-Earth) / × Some(Solar-Earth) / ×
Non(Solar- Earth) / × Any( Who, What, When,
Where, Why, How)
The constructs; Who, What, When, Where, Why, How, are used here to articulate
further Earthly constructs in Mankind's domain that are used to express
any kind of behavior. Which of course as a consequence would also
be used to articulate Satan or the behavior of Sin.
Further Explanation - Other Earth Consequences of Partial Constructs and their Earthly Domain: The Prey/Predator dominion or kingdom, Economic constructs, and Government Constructs.
System, Sub System Mathematics can explain some of these Earthly phenomena. Their Origin, their domain source, in terms of System, Sub System Mathematics and their partial constructs.
The Pseudo transformation/function given by:
Solar-Earth ( __, __, __, ... __, ) = + - / *
....a function of some partial system expression of above stated basic operations. This partial system expression is explained by the multiple terms given by the partial system Solar-Earth expression , which could be the source of only some partial system expression of operations.
The expression below shows " f ", as one of the life expressions given in the " __ " expression of the Solar-Earth expression above.
In order for this life function " f " to attain system wide functionality a product of "Survival of the System-Fittest" syndrome , in this case Solar-Earth functionality, it expresses the Solar-Earth entire domain as it's expression or transformation/function. As with a "Sub System expressed as a System" mentioned several paragraphs above. However.... Unhappily for life function " f ", Solar-Earth expression is merely a partial system construct and true system wide functionality cannot be achieved this way.
f ( __, __, __, ... __, ) = + - / * ;
Adam and Eve in God's Garden with the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" is simply just another such expression.
f ( _A_, _E_, ... _Earth Object Knowledge_, ) = + - / * ;
=> Perpetuation of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil", on Planet Earth.
Economic Constructs, and Government constructs sometimes mistakenly utilize this same partial system expression to attempt dominion.
f( __ ) = ______; Always. Explaining the Perpetuation of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil", on Planet Earth. And perhaps explaining the evolution of sub system to pseudo 'system'. " f " is a resultant Solar-Earth Transformation / Function, giving a Solar-Earth Functional Context of Every(x). Thus giving Life Objects on Earth their corresponding limitations.
And How, f( 1 ) ≠ f ( N > 1) ; Always. Explains why true system wide functionality is never achieved in this way. And the existence of rationale for Non-Systems.
All this could show how Pseudo "Systems" are supported by the Solar-Earth transformation/function.
Also: f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1+0)= + - / × = > f(1,0)= + - / ×.
And Also: f(1) = + - / × = f(0) = + - / × = f(1+0) = + - / × = f(1,0)= + - / ×.
Showing permanent tenets of a Principal System.
Source of Perceived Time Behavior
System / Sub System(s) Expression gives continual generation of unique Item(s)/Event(s) or perception of ongoing time past, future. ....System / Sub System Transformations convey: Conservation of Information, loss of information and meaningful New Information, explaining our perception of the passage of time. And why over time, new information cannot be incorporated into any said "System".
Current "Time" Constructs and their Derivations from
Partial System/Sub System Expression(s)
- Earthly Sequences - Individuals and the Individual Partial System Constructs: A perceived Individual function Any(x) construct, and implied individual functional context Every(x).
- Solar Earth Sequential Relationship - An 'External' System and it's Partial System Constructs giving "Time": This perceived External function Any(x), with other System Components that are implied only, Every(x), Some(x), Non(x).
- Event(s) Numeric Ranking or Hierarchy: This Mathematical construct may have little relevance within a System Sub System paradigm. The only relevance or value may be within a partial system construct.
- Our Universe Relationship and it's Partial System Construct - Time/Space Relativity: Universe Functionality Any(x), other System constructs implied or completely ignored.
- All System/Sub Systems and their Components Considered - Zim Math: System/Sub System Time a Derivation by Logic/Expression.
The Origin
of Time(s) can be found in the following expression where Logic
and its Expression are said to give a basis for a series of cause/effect
behavior or relationship.
f ( ___, ___ ) + - / * ; or f ( ___, ___,
… ___ N ) + - / * ;
An Example Expression of Continuous Info. Behavior (Δ Unit Info)
(Item(1A) × Item(B)) × Events(A1)
A is some principle System, Item B is a partial expression of some Sub System
B
Space Mathematics
Expressions of Qualitative Construct(s) or Partial System and/or Sub System Expressions give Space Mathematics.
f(1,0) = + / - *
f(0) = + / - *
f(1) = + / - *
f(1+0) = + / - *
AND
as expressed by combinations of partial numeric and / or qualitative system constructs....give Space Mathematics
Explanation of "Greatest is the Least, and Least is the Greatest" Paradox
found in the New Testament in the Bible
(Also See Diagram Immediately Below)
This paradox is explained
within the System, Sub System Paradigm. Where the expression of a System
Z and its' many Sub Systems (A,B,C,D) the given "Greatest" or
Z(A,B,C,D) = + - / * ; ; AND the expression of a Sub System
(D) as: D(x) = + - / * ; D(1) = + - / * ; or
D(1,0) = + - / * ; or D(N) = + - / * ; or D(1+0) = + -
/ * ; or even f(D) = + - / * ; the supposed "Least Greatest",
is expressed as a function of the same basic operations modeled as systems.
These expressions show that functional expression Z(A,B,C,D) where, Z,A,B,C,D
are all partial system constructs give a much more limited System functionality
as each object is a unique partial system construct expressed by another
unique partial system construct Z , giving an increasingly limited system
wide functionality. On the other hand some low hierarchal sub system
D expressed as a function of the same functional source of basic operations
modeled as systems would give a system wide functionality. This is attributable
to the lack of constraints offered through its' expressions as opposed to
Z(A,B,C,D) = + - / * .
This is applicable to many existential phenomena experienced in our contemporary
world.
Government
and experiences within this construct. Communication within Mass
Media and Mass Media editorial constructs. Big corporations having
trouble competing. And other $ Financial institutions.
Numerical Objects as Systems
One (1) is considered a True Numeric Object.
All other Numbers are considered partial system derivatives or constructs
as with f(1) = + - / * . The derivative, f(2) expressed as a system
and function of operations also expressed as Systems would give Mathematics
or a portion or subset of Mathematics. f(2) as the ‘number’ we all know,
for example, would give a construct or qualitative construct. Numeric
Systems expressions, on the other hand and their products, are better
characterized as results per the Math Expression Constant ( See Applications
section ). f(0) is a derivative of f(1), but f(0) has no
known derivative. f(0) is a common
behavioral component to all objects, Numeric, Qualitative, Unknown,
or Operational expressed as systems with all behavioral components.
Any object or ‘Numeric’ object expressed as a function of Math operations
also modeled as Systems would have f(0) as a functional component for
the expressed result. Non System 'Numbers' and the Number Line should
be considered a Generality or another Qualitative construct.
The following can always be said to be true:
Every(1) = _______________ .
Any(1) = _______________ .
Some(1) = _______________ .
Non(1) = _______________ .
Or
Every(1) = _______________ X1.
Every(1) = _______________ XY.
Every(1) = _______________ X1.
Every(1) = _______________ XX.
Are also always said to be true.
Numerical Objects or their partial system components expressed as a
function of operations also expressed as systems or partial system expressions,
always has a valid existential result. Where:
f(1) = + - / *; is always true.
Also 1, 0 numeric objects can be described as 1 – 1 Any, or 0 – 0 any.
On the contrary Qualitative Constructs, or partial
system expressions can be said to be never equal as with following expression
of existential Objects:
Qualitative _____ ≠ Qualitative _____ . Which can also be expressed:
f(A,B) = + - / * ; The selection/omission of components A, B give a
self-limiting relationship and expression.
A or B could be some form of 12, X2, XY, 0X, Y0 .
f(1, Man(1,0)) = + - / *; Mathematics
1- 1 Any, 0 - 0 Any; Basic operations expressed as Systems
Sources to Mathematical Patterns
f(1,0, g(1,0)) = + - / ×; f(1,0, g(N,0)) = + - / ×;
f(1,0, f(1,0)) = + - / ×; f(1,0, f(N,0)) = + - / ×;
Generalities and the Role in Deductive - Inductive Reasoning
within a System/Sub System Paradigm
Where a generality is considered some Every(A) or a simple functional context of set of a objects or qualitative constructs which can be characterized as Any(A). This indicates that a Generality would not be applicable within a System and Sub System expression, but may be of value within a System only expression.
Mathematical Methods of Solving Expressions
within the System/Sub System Paradigm
Other useful Mathematical methods for solving expressions may be: Redefining or changing the system construct, or partial system construct. Adding Item(s) and/ or Event(s) to the expression knowing there is an existential solution. Changing the answer.
"(-) Applications"
or
Expressions of Omitted Expression Components
Most current and earthly Applications and expressions of Physical Laws, consist of partial system constructs. (-) Applications may be a way of expressing the limitations of these constructs.
An Identity Function
Apple(x) = + - / ×;
For any Object or 'Fruit' or Qualitative construct or Partial System expressed as a function of the basic operations within a System/Sub System Paradigm. Apple(x) as a functional system component Any(x). The basic operations as Systems with the four behavioral components.
Systems and Growth
(Life, Economic, Physical Object(s)
Earthly Constructs and Their Functional Context(s) expressed, determine
growth parameters, System outcomes, and any series path of the expressed
System.
The expressed Functional Context of said object could be said to be the
given standard(s) or parameter(s) of the object. This could also be
said to determine any functional, purpose, or non stated outcome. As with
the four behavioral components found in any existential object/system.
Possible results from any such expressed Standards could be:
- Standard = __________ . Is True
- Standard1 ×/ Standard2 = > ___________ . May be True.
- Standard1 ×/ Standard2 = > Standard3 . Is True
- Standard1 ×/ Standard2 ×/
... ×/ Standard N = > Constant unit Unknown
(Cx)
The Content of the Expressed Functional Standards or Context(s) may determine System outcomes as in the above expression(s). As with a Earthly construct, Universal Standard, or any such possible standards as with :
f(1)= + - / × ; f(0)= + - / × ;
f(X)= + - / × ; f(Xx)= + - / × ;
f(Xy)= + - / × ;
f(1y)= + - / × ;
f(X1)= + - / × ;
ETC.
Where operations here are expressed as Systems with the four behavioral components. Said to give all possible knowledge states.
Expressions or Standards may also be determined or found by the observation of new groupings or newly stated/described object(s).
Unknown Mathematics
Expressions
f(1) = + / - × ; = > IS an expression, the relationships are an
expression; Could be said to give a birth to expressions or
relationships.
-
G_d = + / - × or G_d(__) = + / - ×; => + / - ×;
-
f(__) = + / - ×; or F(__) = + / - ×; => Xx
Solar – Earth ( __, __ … , __) = + / - ×; Could have given birth to
Relationship, Relationship with “God” or f(1) = + / - × ; = > and
subsequent derivations
f(X) = + / - × ; f(Xx) = + / - × ; f(Xx, Yy) = + / - × ; f(1, Yy) = + / - ×;
f(1x, Yy) = + / - x; f(X1, Yy) = + / - × ; f(1, Y1) = + / - × ; f(1, 1y) = + / - × ;
f(1, 0y) = + / - × ; f(1x, Y0) = + / - × ; f(X1, 00) = + / - × ; f(1, Y0) = + / - × ;
f(1, 0y)
= + / - × ; ETC.
I hope to show here that simply by composing a function or
expression as a variety of Unknown(s), that new functional and
subsequent existential dynamic may be derived. (Operations are
expressed as systems here.)
Universal Applicability of basic operations gives "evidence" of many
things , including existence of God or a principal system
consistency as evidenced by how these operations behave per
expressions available to us or expressions that could be available
to us.
Evaluating Expressions for Alternative Operational Construct(s)
In the true spirit of Creative Math - It is my understanding that there exists alternative Operational constructs to the basic Operations +, - * / and their known derivations.
These Alternative Operational constructs may be derived by evaluating the following expressions.
f ( __, __, .....__ ) = + - / *
or
f ( __, __, .....__ ) = __ __ __ __
using the the following object constructs:
X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0)
to represent system and/or sub system constructs or partial system and/or sub systems. And to represent operational system and/or sub system constructs or partial system and/or sub systems
Stated Object(s) & their Unknown Expression(s) Basis
(within a System / Sub System Paradigm)
What you State indicates it's Expression. As with the Sciences where observation of properties is said theoretically to have an expression basis. As with the Physical Sciences.
- Numeric Objects
- Numeric Unknown Objects
- Numeric Qualitative Unknowns
- Combinations of the above Objects
- Nested Combinations of the above Objects
f(1,X,C,Y) = _____ .
f ( __ ) 1 , f ( __ ) 2 , ... f ( __ ) N = _____ .
f (( __ ) 1 , ( __ ) 2 , ... ( __ ) N ) = _____ .
Energy
E= MC2 can be expressed as a System and/or a Sub System.
Or operations as expressed as System(s) and/or Sub System(s)
Behavior or Forms of Energy, may be the Mathematical consequence of combining Qualitative and Numeric Object constructs in expression(s).
Other Mathematical AND Existential options are available.
System and/or Sub Systems Expressions Synopsis
with the following constructs as possible Systems :
X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), A, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0)
and with the following constructs as possible Sub Systems :
X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0)
The number of objects expressed in this Synopsis is limited to N=1or f(A), N=2 or f (A,B) , N=3 or N>3 or f(A,B,C…Z). Where N=1, this generally depicts existential, physical, etc Function/Relationship. Where N=2, this depicts a general cause/effect relationship. With N=3 or N >3, this could be said to depict physic(s), existential/relativity, or other lawful, knowledge states.
The Following System and/or Sub Systems and their functions can be expressed by the basic operations modeled as systems or some partial expression of these operational systems.
Ohm's Law
As expressed within System/Sub System Paradigm
Current, Voltage, Resistance as (3) related partial system expressions
The (+), (-), (+-) as Metaphors to Explain/Describe Behavior
Physical, Existential, Terrestrial, and even Mathematical
These Mathematical Operations are not currently modeled as Systems or Systems with four behavioral components. To be more useful metaphors this should be taken into consideration.
(+) , (-) , (+-) Qualitative Constructs
as derived by partial System and/or Sub Systems expression &
their role in defining behavior.
The various combinations of system component expression should be explored:
Any(+) * Any(+) * Every(+)
Any(+) Non (-) Any(+)
A Any(+) A Non (-) A Any(+) A
A Any(+) B Non (-) C Any(+) D
A + A
or
A Any(+) A
or
A Every(+) Any(+) Some (+) Non (+) A
or
(Every(A) Any(A) Some (A) Non (A) Every(+) Any(+) Some (+) Non (+) (Every(A) Any(A) Some (A) Non (A)
MC2 = E as the following:
(Every(M)Any(M)Some(M) Non(M) Every(*)Any(*)Some(*)Non(*) (Every(C)Any(C)Some(C) Non(C) Every(*)Any(*)Some(*) Non(*) (Every(C)Any(C)Some (C)Non (C)
< == >
C(E) unit Every(x) Any(x) Some (x) Non (x)
(Principal System Expression Implied)
Behavior of _______ .
Explanations, Expressions, Descriptions, Parametizations,
To model behavior with current models of knowledge, serious limiting parameters
must be utilized. Exploration of objects modeled as Systems and/or
Sub Systems may give more parametization options.
Behavior = _________ .
Behavior A = ________ .
Behavior A = ________ 1.
Behavior X = ________ A .
Behavior X = ________ Y .
Behavior X + Y = ________ (Y + W)1
.
The Life Expression
As System and Sub System, parametized as Item/Event(s), within Item(s)/Event
or Item(s)/Event(s).
(although other parametizations possible)
Mankind or Lifekind's DNA , may not be only a subset of God's information but may be an mathematical image of God's 'DNA' and Information. God's DNA/Information could be expressed as: f(1) = + - / *
Order vs. Disorder
Expressions of Objects as Systems or Sub Systems
Reference Mobile - New Transportation Modalities
Expressing Sub Systems as System(s)
Intelligence and Mankind
(within a System/Sub System Paradigm)
A standard of intelligence that I am aware of, is
based on one's functional context. You may ask, " What is your functional
context?". Our perception and our perception giving awareness of an
existential object can be based on our "functional context".
However, knowledge as we know it on Earth is compromised of Truth AND Falsehood.
In other words knowledge is also the source of misinformation. But this
also means a False statement can somehow always be shown to be a True
statement. I.Q. as now measured is simply another Qualitative construct
and partial system expression.
As I said above, a standard of intelligence can be said to be based on our
functional context. An Earthly functional context would give a source
of misinformation or Truth AND Falsehood. A functional context of
a principal system such as:
f(X) = + / - ×
or
f(1) = + / - ×;
May be a source of Truth and hopefully not Falsehood?
Also of concern is the determination of the functional
context of f(+). The system functionality of the operation + (plus) could
be said to give the state of knowledge or 'Omniscience'. The functional
context of f(+) could help determine this system functionality. A
couple of methods that I am aware of for determining this are found
in the Scientific Method, or a Creative Method.
The Scientific Method would involve solving for all 'known' expressed objects
of concern.
The Creative Method could involve taking any set of objects expressed as
in "Math Concept Art" with the knowledge that there is an existential result.
Exploration of Efficiency of Information and Life Objects
An Existential or Optical Perspective; Mono,. Bio
or Multiple. Where the two optical eye perspectives gives depth perception.
Do Life Partner Relationships give an existential perspective? Non reasons
for >2 Perspective could be that for a perspective >2 no added information
or existential information is generated. Every perspective n >2 is more
partial system construct. Where every object has f (1) = + - / *; as a source
of information....? An efficiency of information for a life object could
be a significant factor. Could this be a reason for scarcity of optical
sensory > 2? And why permanent life partners are significant to Life
Objects. An f(2) expression or an expression of object(s) where n = 2, where
all existential objects are given to be unique as in f(x,y) = +/ - * or
f(1,y) = +/ - * ; could have advantages over life object expressions of
f(x) = +/ - * or f(1) = +/ - * , or f(x,y,z) = +/ - * or f(1,y,z) = +/ -
* . Where all information could be said to be accessible in expressions
of (2) objects, and where expression of (1) object may give access to only
a subset or portion of available information, as with f(of some partial
system construct or sub system). Life Object expressions of objects greater
than 2 as with f(x,y,z) = +/ - * or f(1,y,z) = +/ - * .; may serve to limit
even more of the available information than with object(s)=1 or object(s)=2.
Life and System Mathematics
Object procreation as expressed in System Mathematics
Every(A) + / - * Any(A) + / - * Some(A) + / - * Non(A)
+ / - *
Every(B) + / - * Any(B) + / - * Some(B) + / - * Non(B)
Giving f(1,0) = + / - * or Object(s) expression N > 1
Where: Some(A) + / - *
Some(B) = > Some(C);
this could document the feasibility of Earthly Life Transformations and also
a Principal System to Earth Life Transformation. This also documents the
idea of Mankind being in the Mathematical Image of a Principal System. As
in a Principal System DNA ( f(1,0) = + - * / ) or otherwise termed the Some(x)
system functional component, and not just the DNA image of one's parents.
the expression of two objects & their functional intersections, give
a new functional component and subsequent other system components:
Every(C) + / - * Any(C) + / - * Some(C) + / - * Non(C)
Giving Object(s) expression N > 2 or
possibility there of a pseudo existence of "Tree of Knowledge of Good
and Evil",
where no additional knowledge or existential perspective gained.
Unicellular Life Expression
where Object expression N = 1 ;
f(1) = + - / * ; or
where Object expression N = 2 or
f(1+ 0) = + - / * ; giving function and non functionality (Mutation)
