| Zim Math Home | All Updates Listed | Content for Exhibits | Zim "LinkedIn" Profile | Search Site | Contact Zim |
|
Zim Olson
...
in Creative Mathematics, Math Art , Applications, New Math Constructs, Logic,
and an Existential Synopsis
Denver Colorado USA - Culture/News/Music Zim Mathematics: An Existential Synopsis " An Existential Synopsis with a Systems and/or Sub Systems Paradigm as Expressed" |
| Creativity Intro: | Philosophy | Axioms | Videos | Final Exam |
| Creative Mediums: | Stories | Expressions | Poems | Experiments |
| More Creative Mediums: | Concepts | Games | Survey | Constructs |
| Math Concept Art: | Math Art | Greeting Cards | 1985 Math | Math Art TShirts |
| Applications Intro: | Contents | Page One & Two | Videos | Literature PDF |
| History/Documents: | Math Links | Documents | Biography | Site Map |
| Potential Funders/Employers |
Letters of Permission for Use of Zim Math Material & Content |
Existential Synopsis |
Explanation of Systems and Sub Systems Concepts
An Origin of System Transformation & System Behavioral Components f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1+0)= + - / × = > f(1,0)= + - / ×. or in other terms f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1 and 0)= + - / × = > f(1 and/or 0)= + - / ×. giving another result: f(1) = + - / × = f(0) = + - / × = f(1+0) = + - / × = f(1,0)= + - / ×. Looking at all objects as systems, with four behavioral components, including Numeric objects, qualitative, operational, physical, so called partial or complete system objects, a derivation of system behavioral components and principal system tenets could be notated as follows: 1( + - / ×) = > 0( + - / ×) = > 1+0( + - / ×) = > 1,0( + - / ×) and again in other terms 1( + - / ×) = > 0( + - / ×) = > 1 and 0( + - / ×) = > 1 and/or 0( + - / ×) giving again another similar result 1( + - / ×) = 0( + - / ×) = 1+0( + - / ×) => 1,0( + - / ×) This notation may be more pleasing to some Theologians rather than Mathematicians. However I feel both the expressions of functionality and expressions of numeric object one as a system, can be said to be valid and existentially correct. The expressions of functionality and number object one, differ in that the functionality of one as expressed per any system component(s) give a system wide result where the numeric object one is expressed as a complete system also as a function of the operational systems ; both expressions are said to give system wide results, or access to a principal system. Showing permanent tenets of a Principal System.
Thus any statement, observation, relationships, expression or expression
derivation Is/Are contained in, or part of the principal expression. We
are an expression. Any so called "additional" expression, would
not result in additional information. Expression of Expression(s)
would merely result in Non System wide results or Pseudo Systems.
Other modalities of expression maybe available giving other behavioral alternatives. "Omniscience" The expression of Operations as system objects could be said to give "Omniscience" . Or f(+) gives "Omniscience" . This is a result and consequence of the basic operation "+" expressed as a product of the four system behavioral components and it's products expressed as four system behavioral components resulting in "all knowledge" and all Mathematics. The Universe and Knowledge (the domain of Sub Systems) could also be said to be a result of this condition and it's expression. f(x) = + - / * ; A(x) = + - / * ; f(A) = + - / * ; A(Xy) = + - / * ; could all be said to result in portions of this knowledge state. But we will never achieve "Omniscience" with these types of expressions or expressions of partial system constructs or qualitative constructs. Non Equality Axiom: Every Object modeled as a System or partial system construct with the four behavioral components is said to be unique in terms of its Quantitative and/or Qualitative properties, or it's system functionality. |
|
Theology
•Christianity - System and Sub System perspective.
With four behavioral components. As with the four behavioral
components found in any existential object/system.
f(1,0, Jesus(1,0)) = + - / × Per sermon of Pastor Joe Olsson of New Life Fellowship Foursquare church of Denver Colorado 80222 on August 26, 2012: The Crux of Christianity or Christianity knowledge is " Those who love god or truly love god will go to heaven........ " The thoughts I wrote on this were "(Quantity+ Quality) unit 1 = Love", Where it can be said f(1,0, Jesus(1,0)) = + - / × is just another manner of this expression for a principal system expression. Which may be Mathematically clear to some. For those, where this is not clear, here is a survey of possible Love Object Expressions (Objects modeled as complete Systems) from "(Quantity+ Quality) unit 1 = Love" expression: Single Object or Life Object Love : (Xx) => Xx1; Xx0; Xx1+0; Xx1,0; A1; A0; A1+0; A1,0 Paired Object or Paired Life Object Love: (Xx+Xy) => XY1; XY0; XY1+0; XY1,0;;XX1; XX0; XX1+0; XX1,0; A1; A0; A1+0; A1,0 (Xx+Xx) => A1; A0; A1+0; A1,0 Multiple Object or Life Group Object Love: (A1+B1+...+Z1) => AA1; AA0; AA1+0; AA1,0 (Xx+Xx+Yy+Yy...+Xx+Yy) => A1; A0; A1+0; A1,0 Numeric Object Expression or Life Expression of Numeric Object Love: A(1) => + - / × A(0) => + - / × A(1+0) => + - / × A(1,0) = > + - / × f(1,0, Jesus(1,0)) = + - / × may also be said to be Jesus's "The way, The Truth, and the Life" or "Love". And where "Mankind" is substituted for Jesus giving f(1,0, Mankind(1,0)) = + - / × , would be one's love of G-d, which would be said to "Get him/her to heaven". •Judea - System and Sub System perspective without 4 general behavioral components, particularly in a Principal System. f(1, Torah(A-Z)) = Every +, Every -, Every / , Every × Any +, Any -, Any / , Any ×
•Mathematics - System and/or Sub System perspective
without general behavioral components in the principal system.
f(1, Mathematicians (1, 0 )) = Any +, Any -, Any / , Any ×
•Zim Mathematics - System and/or Sub System perspective
with general behavioral components in the principal system.
All existential objects, including operations , also considered
as Systems and/or Sub Systems.
f(1, 0) = + - / × , ie Creative Mathematics Plug in Values and figure out how it works.
In Summary of my Existential Summary, I would like
to mention the variety of Qualitative Constructs employed by the different
faiths, Sciences and Zim Mathematics. Pure Qualitative constructs
are problematic. So a Source to soulutions is necessary.
I don't feel any qualitative construct and/or Transformation can provide
all functionality for all object(s). Qualitative constructs in Transformations
limits some additional information. A full functionality of a
given qualitative construct is not system wide. For example: f(1Apple,
0Apple) = + - / × , at best is the functionality of an Apple and not
System wide functionality as in: f(1, 0) = + - / × .
|
| Biblical (Systems) Creation in
7 Day(s) f(1)= + / - × ; As Expressed God f(1) = > Holy Spirit f(0) = > (1) Creation - Formless and Void f(1 + 0) = > (2) Heavens and Light f(1,0) = > (3) God + Earth (Earthly Functional Source) f(A1) = > (4) Earth + Spirit (Earthly Non Functional Source) f(A0) = > (5) Earth Life, Garden, Adam (System) f(A1- Z1 + A0 - Z0) = > (6) Created Earth Life, Adam + Eve, Sub System Life as System (Sub System as Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) f(A1- Z1 , A0 - Z0) = > (7) Earthly Creation Complete - God takes a knap f(Z1) Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
| "I Am that I Am" -
God f(A) = f(B) = f(C) = ... = f(Z) Or <---- "I Am" ------> f1 (A-Z) = + / - × and Where (A-Z) is "Am" Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
| The Numeric Object
One & Its' Source and Derivation You may ask...Where did 1 or One or f(1) come from? Or the property metaphor 1 - Any. Every object created by the Solar-Earth (__, __, __, ..., __) ; a Transformation / Function(s), would result in four unique behavioral components for each of these object/function(s). This could result in the numeric construct/metaphor of "One" and give us access or relationship capabilities with a principal system otherwise expressed as God or G-d. Derivations of this metaphor, or numeric object one, are listed below. Hopefully explaining our resultant body of knowledge, and its relationships, and non relationships. And access to a principal system. Giving us system wide and/or non system wide expression capability.
Also of Interest: f( Systems) vs. f (Sub System(s) or G-d (Systems) vs. G-d(Sub System(s)) |
|
Any Sub System functionality as expressed simply
as Any(x) = Any(+); or f(x) = Any(+); would not achieve System
and Sub System functionality until the
incorporation of the basic operation Any(-) in the sub system expression
giving Any(x) = Any(+)Any(-) or f(x) = Any(+)Any(-). I use this Shorthand
expression of the basic operation system expressions, omitting Any(/) and
Any(*), because mathematically f(+,-) => f(+,-,/,*) when the operations
are expressed or modeled as systems. |
|
Explanation of Knowledge Theory found in Book of Genesis of Bible " Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" Is a Sub System Expressed as a System In the church I attend
New Life Fellowship Foursquare church,
Pastor Joe Olsson spoke of "Ownership" as a key concept in the "Eating
of of the Forbidden fruit" (The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil)
and "Original Sin" or "The Fall".....Which has led me
to the following update on the interpretation of this Items/Events. "Tree of Life" ....Barrier's to the System of the Tree of Life could
be said to be "Dependency" of various forms on the Tree(s) of
Knowledge of Good and Evil. Also, 'illness' and 'Death' could be said
to be attributable to these "Dependencies(s)"
Or ....... Solar-Earth( X, Man(X)) = Any(+) . This expression highlights
man's reliance with the operation and its functional component Any(+) and
it's apparent cause/effect relationship in Mankind's or Lifekind's Solar "System".
Other operational system components are ignored. Further Explanation - Other Earth Consequences of Partial Constructs and their Earthly Domain: The Prey/Predator dominion or kingdom, Economic constructs, and Government Constructs. System, Sub System Mathematics can explain some of these Earthly phenomena. Their Origin, their domain source, in terms of System, Sub System Mathematics and their partial constructs. The Pseudo transformation/function(s) given by: Solar-Earth ( __, __, __, ... __, ) = + - / * ....a function of some partial system expression of above stated basic operations. This partial system expression is explained by the multiple terms given by the partial system Solar-Earth expression , which could be the source of only some partial system expression of operations. The expression below shows " f ", as one of the life expressions given in the " __ " expression of the Solar-Earth expression above. In order for this life function " f " to attain system wide functionality a product of "Survival of the System-Fittest" syndrome , in this case Solar-Earth functionality, it expresses the Solar-Earth entire domain as it's expression or transformation/function. As with a "Sub System expressed as a System" mentioned several paragraphs above. However.... Unhappily for life function " f ", Solar-Earth expression is merely a partial system construct and true system wide functionality cannot be achieved this way. f ( __, __, __, ... __, ) = + - / * ; Adam and Eve in God's Garden with the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" is simply just another such expression. f ( _A_, _E_, ... _Earth Object Knowledge_, ) = + - / * ; => Perpetuation of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil", on Planet Earth. Economic Constructs, and Government constructs sometimes mistakenly utilize this same partial system expression to attempt dominion. f( __ ) = ______; Always. Explaining the Perpetuation of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil", on Planet Earth. And perhaps explaining the evolution of sub system to pseudo 'system'. " f " is a resultant Solar-Earth Transformation / Function, giving a Solar-Earth Functional Context of Every(x). Thus giving Life Objects on Earth their corresponding limitations. And How, f( 1 ) ≠ f ( N > 1) ; Always. Explains why true system wide functionality is never achieved in this way. And the existence of rationale for Non-Systems. All this could show how Pseudo "Systems" are supported by the Solar-Earth transformation/function. Also: f(1)= + - / × = > f(0)= + - / × = > f(1+0)= + - / × = > f(1,0)= + - / ×. And Also: f(1) = + - / × = f(0) = + - / × = f(1+0) = + - / × = f(1,0)= + - / ×. Showing permanent tenets of a Principal System. Expressions of knowledge for singular, pairs, or multiple objects are of interest. Drastic differences in existential outcomes for these expressions. Where objects may include people, mass/matter, or Fruit/Apples (Biblical or otherwise) ..... Expressions of singular or paired objects may be functionally compatible within a given system or ad hoc system. Expressions of multiple objects of > 2, may not be functionally compatible within a given system or ad hoc system
|
Source of Perceived Time Behavior System / Sub System(s) Expression gives continual generation of unique Item(s)/Event(s) or perception of ongoing time past, future. ....System / Sub System Transformations convey: Conservation of Information, loss of information and meaningful New Information, explaining our perception of the passage of time. And why over time, new information cannot be incorporated into any said "System". Current "Time" Constructs and their Derivations from Partial System/Sub System Expression(s)
The Origin
of Time(s) can be found in the following expression where Logic
and its Expression are said to give a basis for a series of cause/effect
behavior or relationship.
|
|
Jesus Walks on Water or other Miracle(s) A Mathematical Addition to my work is that with the expression and combination of like System Components of Jesus(1,0) and Earth(1+0) functionality we see these Principal System Miracles or Behavior become “Real” and possess an Existential component. ![]() Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
|
A Mathematical Image for Plant Life f(0) = + - / * or f(0) = __; 0 a function of some complete unknown operation system or in other words, Plant Life may be the image derivative of some Non Functional Component A Mathematical Image for Unicellular Life Forms f(1+0) = + - / * or f(1+0) = ___ ; A System function of some complete and unknown operational system A System functionality derivative |
|
Original Equality Transformation
for this expressed system from anywhere. f(1) = + - / * => f(0) = + - / * => f(1+0)
= + - / * => f(1,0) = + - / * => ______. Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
Space Mathematics Expressions of Qualitative Construct(s) or Partial System and/or Sub System Expressions give Space Mathematics. f(1,0) = + / - * f(0) = + / - * f(1) = + / - * f(1+0) = + / - * AND as expressed by combinations of partial numeric and / or qualitative system constructs....give Space Mathematics Time / Space Systems Expressions and their Constructs Time/Space may be said to consist of the expression(s) of Numeric Systems and Qualitative Partial System Constructs. As I have notated below; Numeric ___ Every(+) Any(+) Some(+) Non(+) Qual ___ Every(+) Any(+) Some(+) Non(+) When Like System Behavioral Components are expressed they may be Mathematically and Existentially combined giving a Time/Space. Time/Space Clocks may consist of some Mathematical Image of this Time/Space Expression? Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
| Economic and Economic Mediums, Game,
Competition, Capitalism THEORY By Scoring Games and subsequent Competition, and by ranking Economic Commodities or Mediums within a System and/or Sub System Hierarchy; New and Relevant Theories can be developed for Economies, Monetary systems of exchange, Games, Competition, Capitalism, ETC. Scoring within Systems, Scoring within Sub Systems, Scoring as Systems and Sub Systems. Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
Explanation of "Greatest is the Least, and Least is the Greatest" Paradox found in the New Testament in the Bible (Also See Diagram Immediately Below) This paradox is explained
within the System, Sub System Paradigm. Where the expression of a System
Z and its' many Sub Systems (A,B,C,D) the given "Greatest" or
Z(A,B,C,D) = + - / * ; ; AND the expression of a Sub System
(D) as: D(x) = + - / * ; D(1) = + - / * ; or
D(1,0) = + - / * ; or D(N) = + - / * ; or D(1+0) = + -
/ * ; or even f(D) = + - / * ; the supposed "Least
Greatest", is expressed as a function of the same basic operations
modeled as systems. These expressions show that functional expression
Z(A,B,C,D) where, Z,A,B,C,D are all partial system constructs give a much
more limited System functionality as each object is a unique partial system
construct expressed by another unique partial system construct Z , giving
an increasingly limited system wide functionality. On the other hand
some low hierarchal sub system D expressed as a function of the same functional
source of basic operations modeled as systems would give a system wide functionality.
This is attributable to the lack of constraints offered through its' expressions
as opposed to Z(A,B,C,D) = + - / * .
|
|
One (1) is considered a True Numeric Object.
All other Numbers are considered partial system derivatives or constructs
as with f(1) = + - / * . The derivative, f(2) expressed as a system
and function of operations also expressed as Systems would give Mathematics
or a portion or subset of Mathematics. f(2) as the ‘number’ we all know,
for example, would give a construct or qualitative construct. Numeric
Systems expressions, on the other hand and their products, are better
characterized as results per the Math Expression Constant ( See Applications
section ). f(0) is a derivative of f(1), but f(0) has no
known derivative. f(0) is a common
behavioral component to all objects, Numeric, Qualitative, Unknown,
or Operational expressed as systems with all behavioral components.
Any object or ‘Numeric’ object expressed as a function of Math operations
also modeled as Systems would have f(0) as a functional component for
the expressed result. Non System 'Numbers' and the Number Line should
be considered a Generality or another Qualitative construct.
Or
On the contrary Qualitative Constructs, or partial
system expressions can be said to be never equal as with following expression
of existential Objects:
|
f(1, Man(1,0)) = + - / *; Mathematics 1- 1 Any, 0 - 0 Any; Basic operations expressed as Systems Sources to Mathematical Patterns f(1,0, g(1,0)) = + - / ×; f(1,0, g(N,0)) = + - / ×; f(1,0, f(1,0)) = + - / ×; f(1,0, f(N,0)) = + - / ×;
|
Generalities and the Role in Deductive - Inductive Reasoning within a System/Sub System Paradigm Where a generality is considered some Every(A) or a simple functional context of set of a objects or qualitative constructs which can be characterized as Any(A). This indicates that a Generality would not be applicable within a System and Sub System expression, but may be of value within a System only expression. |
Mathematical Methods of Solving Expressions within the System/Sub System Paradigm Other useful Mathematical methods for solving expressions may be: Redefining or changing the system construct, or partial system construct. Adding Item(s) and/ or Event(s) to the expression knowing there is an existential solution. Changing the answer. |
"(-) Applications" or Expressions of Omitted Expression Components Most current and earthly Applications and expressions of Physical Laws, consist of partial system constructs. (-) Applications may be a way of expressing the limitations of these constructs. |
An Identity Function Apple(x) = + - / ×; For any Object or 'Fruit' or Qualitative construct or Partial System expressed as a function of the basic operations within a System/Sub System Paradigm. Apple(x) as a functional system component Any(x). The basic operations as Systems with the four behavioral components. |
|
Possible results from any such expressed Standards could be:
The Content of the Expressed Functional Standards or Context(s) may determine System outcomes as in the above expression(s). As with a Earthly construct, Universal Standard, or any such possible standards as with : f(1)= + - / × ; f(0)= + - / × ; f(X)= + - / × ; f(Xx)= + - / × ; f(Xy)= + - / × ; f(1y)= + - / × ; f(X1)= + - / × ; ETC. Where operations here are expressed as Systems with the four behavioral components. Said to give all possible knowledge states. Expressions or Standards may also be determined or found by the observation of new groupings or newly stated/described object(s). |
|
Unknown Mathematics
f(1x, Yy) = + / - x; f(X1, Yy) = + / - × ; f(1, Y1) = + / - × ; f(1, 1y) = + / - × ; f(1, 0y) = + / - × ; f(1x, Y0) = + / - × ; f(X1, 00) = + / - × ; f(1, Y0) = + / - × ; f(1, 0y) = + / - × ; ETC. |
|
Evaluating Expressions for Alternative Operational Construct(s) In the true spirit of Creative Math - It is my understanding that there exists alternative Operational constructs to the basic Operations +, - * / and their known derivations. These Alternative Operational constructs may be derived by evaluating the following expressions. f ( __, __, .....__ ) = + - / * or f ( __, __, .....__ ) = __ __ __ __ using the the following object constructs: X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0) to represent system and/or sub system constructs or partial system and/or sub systems. And to represent operational system and/or sub system constructs or partial system and/or sub systems |
| General
Problem Parameterization and Configurations within System, System and Sub System, or Sub System Context ![]() Every Day problems can be readily portrayed within the System and/or Sub System paradigm. These problem / objects can be configured by some combination of Equality / Non Equality expression (See Above Graphic) . This problem configuration can be further developed by placing this problem / object within System, System and Sub System, or Sub System Context(s), and some variable Object Construct. This may help to show that all problems are not static objects and have many possible expressions, contexts, constructs, and variable configurations (As shown by Math Art above) |
| What
is Ownership? System Ownership? System + Sub System Ownership? Sub System Ownership? ![]()
= 1, 1x, X1, Ax, A1, Xy ......ETC. |
|
Problems and Their Solutions As ____ . As Systems, As Sub Systems + Systems As Sub Systems Where Problems can be outlined as: ___ ≠ ___ + ___ = ___ Or ___ = ___ + ___ = ___, ___ + ___ = ___, ___, .... ____ Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
|
Expressions of Productivity Productivity A + Productivity B + ....... + Productivity Z In terms of f( __ ); ___ (1); ___ (1,0); ___( 0 ); ___ (A); f(A); ___ (A-Z); f(A-Z). Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
![]() Stated Object(s) & their Unknown Expression(s) Basis (within a System / Sub System Paradigm) What you State indicates it's Expression. As with the Sciences where observation of properties is said theoretically to have an expression basis. As with the Physical Sciences.
f(1,X,C,Y) = _____ .
f ( __ ) 1 , f ( __ ) 2 , ... f ( __ ) N = _____ .
f (( __ ) 1 , ( __ ) 2 , ... ( __ ) N ) = _____ . |
| System Self Expression For Given Object/System A, each behavioral component of A can be expressed as function of complete operational expression or partial operational system expression. Every(A) = + - / * + Any(A) = + - / * + Some(A) = + - / * + Non(A) = + - / * The red and black notated operational constructs can indicate either system and/or sub system operation constructs --------------------------------------------- Mathematical Documentation of this and their Logical Outcomes The role of this Mathematics in Historic development of God Principles (Principle System) I feel it is Axiomatic as in Self Evident that these System Behavioral Components exist for Humans and all objects in our experience. The existential basis of these components and all objects in our experience is derived as Mathematically documented below. The human components stated below can be said to be expressed 'individually'. Here they are said to be expressed as a function of the operational system component +. When each behavioral component is expressed as a function of either a complete expression of + , like but incomplete terms and expressions of + , or unlike but also incomplete expressions of +, and as some principal or some System and / or Sub System expression , we get different existential/logical outcomes . When the individual components are expressed in like terms the components can be mathematically combined. Every Human A(1) = + Any Human A(1) = + Some Human A(1) = + Non Human A(1) = + We can get a Principal System Outcome (Know, Access, or System Wide) vs. a Earthly functional outcome, or some Non Earthly functional outcome. Some of these Mankind/Human and/or Earthly outcomes are Mathematically documented below: Mankind (1,0) = + ; Source to complete Mankind Function Mankind (A1) = + ; Source to Earth Function Mankind (A0) = + ; Non Function on Earth Mankind (A1 + A0) = + ; Earth System Function Mankind (A1, A0) = + ; Life on Earth function Other Metaphors describing above expressions could be helpful Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
| Economic Constructs within Systems Expression Other expressions of Economics and their given constructs are available within the System and/or Sub System paradigm. Giving possibilities of, among other things, useful and viable Sub economies. Perhaps giving additional useful management, administrative, or governing tools. Where a universal system wide economic structure is seen as a limiting economic approach. A Governing system could have multiple economic and monetary systems with their unique constructs. Any sub economic and monetary construct is said to have it's own unique functional context, non stated functionality and common or intersecting informational properties. This sub economic and monetary construct is expressible as any so called system, universal, or principle system or construct. However it possesses it's own unique expressible properties. As I said , this could serve as a useful tool for administration, management, or governing of a given sub construct or supposed population construct. |
|
Energy E= MC2 can be expressed as a System and/or a Sub System. Or operations as expressed as System(s) and/or Sub System(s) Behavior or Forms of Energy, may be the Mathematical consequence of combining Qualitative and Numeric Object constructs in expression(s). Other Mathematical AND Existential options are available. With the outlined Solution Method below, you can Solve with any Known Operational System or Unknown Operational Systems, by exhaustively employing known or "unknown" expressed constructs. And then by combining the expressions, with like system component combinations for Mathematical/Existential solutions or soulutions. And then with utilzing the E=MC2 expressions as one of the expression objects we can visualize some of the known or other possible results of this Mathematical/Existential expression Every( ___ )
Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+) Every( ___ , ___ )
Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+) Every( ___ , ___, ...
____ ) Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+)
Every( E=MC2 )
Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+) Every( E=MC2 , E=MC2
) Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+) Every( E=MC2 , E=MC2,
... E=MC2_ ) Every(+)Any(+)Some(+)Non(+)
Expressions of Source and Location of Energy
<---- Source of Energy ------> f1 (A-Z) = + / - × and Where (A-Z) is "Location of Energy" Location of Energy consists of some Qualitative and/or Numeric Expression explained as some partial principal system expression. The utilization of such an expression gives variable "Energy Location" constructs from given Principal System(s) sources or Energy Source(s). |
System and/or Sub Systems Expressions Synopsis with the following constructs as possible Systems : X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), A, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0) and with the following constructs as possible Sub Systems : X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0) The number of objects expressed in this Synopsis is limited to N=1or f(A), N=2 or f (A,B) , N=3 or N>3 or f(A,B,C…Z). Where N=1, this generally depicts existential, physical, etc Function/Relationship. Where N=2, this depicts a general cause/effect relationship. With N=3 or N >3, this could be said to depict physic(s), existential/relativity, or other lawful, knowledge states. The Following System and/or Sub Systems and their functions can be expressed by the basic operations modeled as systems or some partial expression of these operational systems. ![]() |
Ohm's Law As expressed within System/Sub System Paradigm Current, Voltage, Resistance as (3) related partial system expressions |
![]() |
|
Logic An analogy for expressing this logic paradigm can be seen in the typical PC computer model. Where the function of 1 and / or 0 as given by a Mathematical (Earthly) functional value of (+) would represent the computer language at a base level in a computer. Logic within a computer and within a computer's application software could take many forms as expressed. Such as Mathematically stated with : f(1,0) = Any(+); Any A (+);
Every A (+) Any B (+); etc. f(1,0) = Every(+) Any(+) Some(+) Non (+). As with a computer, Logic could take many forms as expressed. Any subsequent expressions of logic would be said to be a subset of the principal expression. Such as the following expressions: Every A (+) Any(+) Some(+) Non (+) ; Every(+) Any A (+) ; Every(+) Any(+) Some(+) Non A (+). Expression(s) and/or Logic (True and/or False) Computer Science and Mathematics are very aware of the interchangeability of these conceptual commodities. Here is my take on this: Expressions of equalities and non equalities can be said to give logic or True and False statements. Expressions of equalities can be 'added' to give a Truth expression. Expressions of Equality and Non Equality can be combined as in the following example to give a Logical Expression: 2 ≠ Z ; 0 Value or a False Value Y = 2X + Z ; 1 Value or a Truth Value X = 2 + Y ; 1 Value or a Truth Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f(1 and/or 0) : X + Y = 2X + Z + 2 ≠ Z ; + can serve as a logical variable consisting of a operational system and/or sub system as complete system(s) with four behavioral components expression or a partial system expression. This operational variable determines the logical outcome.
|
The (+), (-), (+-) as Metaphors to Explain/Describe Behavior Physical, Existential, Terrestrial, and even Mathematical These Mathematical Operations are not currently modeled as Systems or Systems with four behavioral components. To be more useful metaphors this should be taken into consideration. (+) , (-) , (+-) Qualitative Constructs as derived by partial System and/or Sub Systems expression & their role in defining behavior. The various combinations of system component expression should be explored: Any(+) * Any(+) * Every(+) Any(+) Non (-) Any(+) A Any(+) A Non (-) A Any(+) A A Any(+) B Non (-) C Any(+) D A + A or A Any(+) A or A Every(+) Any(+) Some (+) Non (+) A or (Every(A) Any(A) Some (A) Non (A) Every(+) Any(+) Some (+) Non (+) (Every(A) Any(A) Some (A) Non (A) MC2 = E as the following: (Every(M)Any(M)Some(M) Non(M) Every(*)Any(*)Some(*)Non(*) (Every(C)Any(C)Some(C) Non(C) Every(*)Any(*)Some(*) Non(*) (Every(C)Any(C)Some (C)Non (C) < == > C(E) unit Every(x) Any(x) Some (x) Non (x) (Principal System Expression Implied) This could be said to be the result from a selected / omitted Time series plot of Item(s) and Event(s). Where the selected construct could consist of cumulative Intelligence Items and Events. Giving a cumulative cause/effect relationship resulting in the manifestation of a Energy relationship E=MC2. A key variable in this expression may be the selection / omission of system behavioral components for the operational system (+) plus. |
Expression Constant & The Speed of Light "C" ![]() The exhaustive parametization and expression of mass/matter as expressed by E=MC2, gives a speed of light 'c'. The exhaustive parametization and expression of any physical or other attribute, ____ /matter as expressed by any Math expression, gives a qualitative constant. Fruit, or any other matter grouping. Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
|
Behavior = _________ . |
The Life Expression As System and Sub System, parametized as Item/Event(s), within Item(s)/Event or Item(s)/Event(s). (although other parametizations possible) Mankind or Lifekind's DNA , may not be only a subset of God's information but may be an mathematical image of God's 'DNA' and Information. God's DNA/Information could be expressed as: f(1) = + - / *
|
Order vs. Disorder Expressions of Objects as Systems or Sub Systems
|
Reference Mobile - New Transportation Modalities Expressing Sub Systems as System(s) |
Geometries and Functional Orientations Perhaps the Pope was somehow right in his debate with Galileo on the Orientation of the Earth and the Universe. The Earth may not be the Geometric center of the Universe, but perhaps it is a functional center of the Universe. As for Geometric orientations such as a center, any geometric configuration for any given locus is most likely applicably appropriate. The flatness of the Earth can make as much sense as a spherical Earth. Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative expressions giving a Space Mathematics, may give a survey of possible Geometries with their Functional Orientations. Perhaps the Moral to this Story is "The Pope should have done his Math homework", and maybe the Pope and Galileo should have been aware of the option of Creative Mathematics. Existential Synopsis - Table of Contents |
|
Intelligence and Mankind (within a System/Sub System Paradigm) A standard of intelligence that I am aware of, is
based on one's functional context. You may ask, " What is your functional
context?". Our perception and our perception giving awareness
of an existential object can be based on our "functional context". f(X) = + / - × Also of concern is the determination of the functional
context of f(+). The system functionality of the operation + (plus) could
be said to give the state of knowledge or 'Omniscience'. The functional
context of f(+) could help determine this system functionality. A
couple of methods that I am aware of for determining this are found
in the Scientific Method, or a Creative Method. |
|
An Existential or Optical Perspective; Mono,. Bio
or Multiple. Where the two optical eye perspectives gives depth perception.
Do Life Partner Relationships give an existential perspective? Non reasons
for >2 Perspective could be that for a perspective >2 no added information
or existential information is generated. Every perspective n >2 is more
partial system construct. Where every object has f (1) = + - / *; as a source
of information....? An efficiency of information for a life object could
be a significant factor. Could this be a reason for scarcity of optical
sensory > 2? And why permanent life partners are significant to Life
Objects. An f(2) expression or an expression of object(s) where n = 2, where
all existential objects are given to be unique as in f(x,y) = +/ - * or
f(1,y) = +/ - * ; could have advantages over life object expressions of
f(x) = +/ - * or f(1) = +/ - * , or f(x,y,z) = +/ - * or f(1,y,z) = +/ -
* . Where all information could be said to be accessible in expressions
of (2) objects, and where expression of (1) object may give access to only
a subset or portion of available information, as with f(of some partial
system construct or sub system). Life Object expressions of objects greater
than 2 as with f(x,y,z) = +/ - * or f(1,y,z) = +/ - * .; may serve to limit
even more of the available information than with object(s)=1 or object(s)=2.
|
Life and System Mathematics Object procreation as expressed in System Mathematics Every(A) + / - * Any(A) + / - * Some(A) + / - * Non(A) Giving f(1,0) = + / - * or Object(s) expression N > 1 Where: Some(A) + / - *
Some(B) = > Some(C); Every(C) + / - * Any(C) + / - * Some(C) + / - * Non(C) Giving Object(s) expression N > 2 or Unicellular Life Expression f(1) = + - / * ; or where Object expression N = 2 or f(1+ 0) = + - / * ; giving function and non functionality (Mutation) |
|
Zim's Explanation of the above 'Original State' or 'Original Transformation' Venn Diagram in terms of portions of stated Christianity, and how Computer Language works and does not work. The purpose of this exercise is to show the existential feasibility of stories in the Bible and also possibility of useful Mathematical Applicability:
With the application of full set of basic operations
to each component of a Principal System, the intersection of this Venn Diagram
would give a complete circle. As I have said this before, this diagram of
System and/or Sub System functionality, is said to represent functionality
for any Object. Principal System or any said Object. Thus giving credence
and basis for the Theological notions of "Omniscience", "Omnipresence",
and "Omni sapient" , expressible in all things or objects. "Omni
sapient", could be said to be derived from "Omniscience" "Omnipresent"
in all things. |
|
Every(Quan)+Any(Quan)+Some(Quan)+Non(Quan)+ Every(Qual)+Any(Qual)+Some(Qual)+Non(Qual) |