Zim Math Summary - Notes for Monologue - Video Series
Updated 2/12/2010 5:52 AM
Working or Non-Working Human Reality Maps
* Simple concept, Murphy's Law, Girlfriend Reality Map that always fails, Items and/or Events, Systems and/or Sub Systems, Models Physical Laws as well, including Gravity, Fails any time line, applies System maintenance, Defense Systems.
* Human Reality Map consists of some Sub System Reality. With all existential implications of which I highlight many many at zimmathematics.com . Axiomatic but Finite in applications.
System/God Transformations
* Model all perceivable Items/Events as Systems. To model existing systems, can be broken into Items or Events to fit existing paradigms, or Systems or Sub Systems, Explain the four different behavioral components, Principal Systems and Sub Systems, Implications and System - Sub System dynamics, Mention Non Functional Component. Expands frontier on modeling existential behavior.
* Explain why not all Items/Events cannot be modeled as integral part of principal system.
Non Functional Components of Systems
* Know about this already, Murphy's law, I expand on this for applications purpose, Part of Human Reality, Explains stupidity, chaos, Atoms on non linear behavior, Behavior System to sub system, Needs mathematical refining but existentially true, Metaphor - Stupidity Constant, First explained in Math Forum where I got razzed at first.
* existential behavior available to all systems, Defense Systems, Life Systems, Atomic and Physical, symbolic systems.
System Relational Transformation #4
* System behavioral components said to be somehow equivalent, examples of this in partial components, Not entirely intuitive, Examples of Words, by specific components, Physical Laws, need examples., Applies to existential phenomena, Need better examples.
* Mention other Axioms covered later.
* I heard the phrase first mentioned for Mathematical Relational Transformations in Wolframs book & ;A Kind of Science& ; . And I use it now to describe my own System Relational Transformations.
System - Sub System Functional Dynamic #5
* There is such a thing as basic System- Sub System function dynamics, Example: A functionality of Chaos, where you take just one component of a system or sub system, such as some(x), identify missing components to come up with other paradigms, Hurricane example, Managing chaos. Religion may say system cannot be a function of a sub system. Other methods however. Different ways to approach systems and sub systems.
Charting Linear Matrix Algebra #6
* What are you going to do with all this extra information mathematically. You don't have to use all this extra info for results. Can detect some phenomena with partial transformations, and add other components later.
Non Functional Component and C Law x #7
* Constant Law unit unknown. Strive for Laws following mathematics. Non Functional component of Law systems. Maybe useful metaphor. Systems of Laws as Systems and/or Sub Systems. Relationship of Items and/or Events to Laws. Facts and Laws and their relationship. Balance between Facts and Laws. What happens when there is not balance between facts and Laws.
* Symbolic existential reality revealed. Limits to symbolic expression.
* Symbols as systems
* Different expressions of symbols now available uncovering meaning.
* Sub System Law.......AND role of a principal system. By Component or full system transformations or expressions.
Constant unit Unknown Expressions #8
* Came up with this in 1984. Didn't understand at first and still thinking of it. Kind of a metaphor. Any Item/Event can be expressed this way. Cx and Non Cx. I claim there is always a solution. Maybe more logical than mathematical. Logic in Algebraic terms? A and Non A has a value to solve this for is Axiomatic. Useful in System Transformations.
* Useful combinations of Cx in describing different System Sub System categories. Documenting and previously undocumented behavior. Such as Life and/or Death phenomena. And the existence of Sub Systems and Non Sub Systems.
Perception within a Mathematical/Statistical System # 9
* A fresh look at this. Use my System transformation to look at this. Quantum behavior analyzed. Within System and Sub System. Scientist, atom, electron. Modeling as Scientist as System, Atom as another System, and electron as a sub system.
* Intelligence in System Sub System modeling. System components of Intelligence. Intelligence integral part of principal system. See Venn Diagram.
Common Informational Properties #10
* Done some work on in Math Art. This is implied in Mathematics. Apple example. More informational properties need to be involved in Mathematics. I map them in Math. Art, and try to come up with useful Math applications. If you took some time you could come up with very interesting Map. Structured flow chart of System components. Also did a map of a system of non equalities. Explain please.
* Also involve operations in information Maps. Possible interesting future project.
* Information Maps of Items and/or Events and System components also interesting future projects.
Mass Communication Mathematics #11
* Need for this. Came up with idea for this in 1984. Cartoon. Mega phone. I know. You know. Not aligned. Journalism class , High School and Who, what , when , where, why, how, and now use system components. Not easy but should be strived for.
* What is the meaning of a 'Communication 1' though a Mass Communication Medium of 'Vector X'. System behavioral components may help clarify.
A Mathematical Free Lunch #`12
* & ;No such thing as a Free Lunch& ; . Need to look at as System Sub System. To Sub System there might be a Free Lunch. Examples. Food Banks, Thrift stores, God's Garden? Apple on tree? Critical Dollar example? Is there a real economic free lunch through this model?
Creative Calendar Examples #13
* approaches to developing calendars. Behavioral components to systems used. Examples..... Items and / or Events. Zim Math uses both. But can break them out to Items or Events. OR intersections of Items and/or Events in Sub Systems to Systems.
* Some Sub Systems may share Items and / or Events with other Sub Systems. Others may have unique Items and Events.
A Non Equality Axiom #14
* Oxymoron to most Mathematicians. Any system in terms of its Quantitative and Qualitative properties and it's sub Systems is not equal to any other system. Hydrogen Atom example and behavioral components. Most Mathematicians have trouble with this. But it is true. Welcome feedback. Correct, Not correct , or not totally correct.
* This has possible implications to interpretation of Physical Constants and Laws.
Systems Sub Systems of Chaos #15
* Chaos could be one component of behavior such as Some(x) . Pattern achieved because only one component is used. Identify other components and apply principle system , and get a functionality. Intelligence,....sustain transformation over time with conservation of information. Mentioned before in physics as with linear accelerators. Interesting way to put it. Needs development.
* Chaos Clocks - Besides randomly generated clocks used in computer science. They could consist of : A principal functionality generating randomness or the components of randomness. This could seem unlimited.
A case for Numerology #16
* Most mathematicians would probably feel this is hocus pocus. But after some math principles I developed. Unsubordinate Fact. Math Expression Principle. Relationship between numbers factored and result? I felt in the past this was hocus pocus myself. One One gives a general qualitative value? Two might be basis for general qualitative value? Bible thinks 7 and others significant. I need to work on this. But some general relationship between numbers and qualitative values there.
* I feel there can be a general qualitative result to specific numeric factors.
Systems a function of Time? #17
* Behavior a pure function of numeric time? There is no such thing. Because of Items and Events and modeling as systems. Modeling systems as function of time makes no sense. Most things now modeled as sequential function of time.
* Sub Systems a function of a System , not just a numeric function of time, I feel is more existentially correct.
Systems changing and maintenance #18
* System potential for change. Expand on system potential for change. Big thing for our modern world. Everything is a system. How do we maintain. Do we invest for ever. Make pyramids? Systems that last forever? Identify systems that are already out there and work with them. Go with the flow. Possible, because a lot of systems are out there. A true creative concept.
* System mining, finding systems already out there and utilizing them. Use of Math. Expression Constant Principle to find these.
* Mapping of Common Informational Properties could help find and utilize these and their components.
God Unit X #19
* God A + God B + God C = God unit x. Usually no math regarding God. But I think this is a mistake. God in terms of basic operations. May be useful. Apple + Orange + Pear = Fruit unit x. Similar existential and mathematical implications and applications.
* God analysis, use basic operations with God components to document God. Omniscience expression is one example of possibility of this.
Definition Theory or Functionality #20
* Based on words all Items/ Events as systems. Bible good way to define this way. A good meaning for each word. Complete way of defining. Jokes on current definition theory. Math. Art on definition theory. Good fuel for thought.
* Definition Theory vs. Absolute(s). Truths can be determined by Definition Art. There is nothing that can be absolutely defined.
* Symbolic limits. The more you define, the more limited you are, contraindication for intelligent behavior. This is true within the System Sub System model.
Interpretation of Physics Constants #21
* In regard to all Items/Events as systems, forces, symbols, expressions. Four behavioral components each. Underlying existential behavior. Speed of light has a context. Etc. behavior to pre existing paradigms.
* existential behavior to Physical Laws and Constants. Parameters to beget laws. Limits on pre existing Laws.
* Laws and their definitions. Their co existential relationships.
* Systems of Laws, Sub Systems of Laws. Definitions of Laws, constants and Unconditional Logic.
Math. Expression Constant Principle #22
* Explanation: First unsubordinate fact. Quan * Quan +> Qual. Then went to: Any existential expression of any existential expressions gives a unique expression......Every expression is unique. Non Equality Axiom. A lot of interesting implications. Gravity. Phi Time relationships. Cumulative phi time relationships. Light, Energy, and Physical constants. Operations apply also.
* This could show a key component of all Intelligent behavior. The capacity to express objects differently providing generating and interpreting unique results. In the quest of knoweldge.
Critical Information #23
* Use prior axioms. As applied system components. As applied to Operations. Operations and system components. Different combinations of expressions. These expressions can give reasons for intelligence, rationality. Apply to real existential systems, Life also, in next segment. Words achieve critical information. How to create systems. Partial expressions of interest. Makes more manageable.
* The operation of + expressing components of a system is said to produce this relationship. Also said to produce an Unconditional Logic. Such as in Gravitation, maybe light, energy. This operation could be said to be a co-existential transformation. Either a system and/or sub system.
* The operations expressing Systems and not components of systems, are said to produce another System. Somehow different than Critical Information.
* This could also be said to produce a Barrier of Relationships. Which can also be dealt with existentially, but in a different manner.
Life Creation Model #24
* Critical condition of information. Partial transformations. Zim Math Farms. Different Life Creation models. Phi time relationships supported by Principal system gives various results. Plant example, human example, one parent example. One cell animal example. Merging of Venn diagrams? More flexibility to Life Creation than thought. Barrier of Relations metaphor.....I feel this exists and can be dealt with Mathematically.
* Zim Math Farms......Generating or creating systems, nurturing or supporting the growth of - unique systems. Is a Mathematical possibility.
Reference Mobile #25
* Use all other principles and Axioms, Use this to come up with a transportation model. Intersections of Items/or Events could provide modality. Definitions of Systems of concern important. This concept could also provide efficiency in Manufacturing and Life models.
Earth Temperature Model #26
* Not very elaborate now. Each component consists of +B, -B for each component. B is temperature functionality of Earth. Also use System Relational Transformation to solve mathematically.
Unconditional Logic #27
* All items / Events in Systems related. Renaissance thinkers thought this somehow true. Zim says true for systems. Not true for Systems and Sub Systems. Give reasons for chaos, and stupidity in this case. Scientifically and Philosophy interesting. Models Atomic components. Gravity also.
* The interpretation of Gravity etc as a manifestation of Unconditional logic has implications and is of interest. Other Objects possess possibly the same existential traits.
Mind/ Matter => Knowledge States #28
* Science needs this information. Quest for knowledge not complete without this. My Mind/Matter Expressions interesting. Inner IQ, Outer IQ etc. Grouping combinations give different states of knowledge. Venn diagram and intersections.
|
* (Mind A / Matter)1 => Man or Inner IQ or Psychology; * (Matter / Mind B)1 => God or some external IQ; * (Mind A / Matter1-N / Mind B)C => Chaos; * Mind A / (Matter / Mind B)1 => Man X; * (Mind A / Matter)1 / Mind B => God X; * (Mind A / Matter 1 / Mind B)1 => Order/Science; * (Mind X / Matter A ) 1 = > Hypothesis; * (Mind A / Matter A) + (Mind B / Matter B) = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / (Matter A + Matter B) = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / Constant ( A + B ) unit x = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / Constant ( A + Not A + B + Not B) unit x = > Basis for Discussion and Compromise. Or a & ;Apple/Fruit& ; Transformation; Matter A or Matter B could be an Psychological/Mathematical assessment. |
Venn Diagram of God, Matter, and Knowledge |
Information Concepts and Dictionary #29
* Why Dictionary always done the same way, why? Does not use my System Transformation in anyway. Missing possible meanings. Computer concepts helpful also, Boolean logic, flow charts, circumstantial logic.
* Definition Art
* Relationships between Definitions and Words. Is their integrity?
Political Expressions #30
* Partial Transformations, in elections. As with my gripe with Journalism. Not only use Who, what, when, where, why, how. And do not use System components and their behavioral truths.
God's Garden #31
* Biblical Garden in Genesis book. Tree of knowledge of Good and Evil. When you eat of it you shall surely die. Gives knowledge to good and bad concepts. Note Transformation categories explains this behavior. Limited results, not system wide results. Alternative is to access the Tree of Life in book of Genesis. Jesus made access to principal system possible. Holy spirit and Non Functional component of Principal system as outlined in a Venn Diagram. Axiomatic and Finite as to the Tree of Knowledge or sub system.
* Zim Math Farms
*
Object Analysis and Item and/or Events expressions #32
Zim Math - Items and Events. Science uses one or other or at both. Math. Expression Constant gives dynamic. Take partial expression for analysis purposes. Relativity, clocks, space and their expressions. slant on relativity. More information. analysis of Relativity. Creative parametization can make this