I have often pondered the particular human problem
of what actually constitutes moral vs. immoral behavior. To survive,
mankind must somehow find a suitable 'chicken' to put in his cooking
pot for food, etc. Unfortunately at times mankind does not
clearly define to himself as what is actually a 'chicken' or some other
Human domain. Which eventually may be considered by other 'chickens'
or Humans as immoral behavior.
I will list below variations of existential
human behavior in various formats. I will use expressions I have already
used in other parts of my web site, Zim Mathematics, such as expressions
of systems as principal systems, qualitative constructs, or of
numeric objects....... as functions of operations as systems or
other qualitative constructs, based on partial system expressions
or partial numeric object expressions.
I hope to show how a 'chicken' in your
'pot' may become a moral or immoral behavior.
The issues of what is Right vs. Wrong, and categorizing
all behavior into categories of Right and Wrong is problematic.
Maybe you can assume Right ≠ Wrong. But calculating
how all behavior fits into variations of these categories may not be
attainable. I propose that Wrong behavior or Immoral behavior
be more accurately characterized as a Partial System Wide Expression,
and Right Behavior or Moral Behavior be characterized as a System Wide
Behavior or Expression.
f(1,0, Mankind(1,0)) =
+ - / * ; Moral Behavior? System Wide Function or
Expression?
f(A, Mankind(B)) = Any + Any-
Any / Any * ; May not compute to Moral Behavior? Not a System
Wide Function or Expression?
f(1, Mankind(1,0) = +
- / *; May not always be Moral Behavior? Not a System Wide
Function or Expression?
f(A, Mankind(1,0)
= + - / * ; Moral under limited context? Not
a System Wide Function or Expression?