Zim Math Home | Updates | Intro: Applications -Application Summary/Videos  | Creative Axiom Text / Poems - Creative Axiom Videos  | Creative Concepts | Creative Axiom List | Mathematics Art | Song/Poems | Expression/Formulas | Thought Experiments | Math Art Games | Math Stories | Creative Math Survey  | Documents | Creativity Exam | Calendar Concepts |Recycle Bin | Math Links |Contact | Zim Biography |SiteMap

Expressions Showing a Relationship between Quantity and Quality

 | Next |Back |

  • Quan × Quan => Qual  ; Unsubordinate Fact
  • Quan(a) × Quan(b) = > Qual(C)
    • Possible Bottom Up System/Management Application
    • 21 × 31 => C6
       
    • 2Apple × 3Apple => C6 ; Gives unique Qualitative result with a numeric correlation, not just 'Six Apples'!
       
    • 2unit1 × 3unit1 => 6unitc ; 6 = C or 6 = Qual ; Numeric factoring implies a resultant qualitative state with a Numeric constant, for any Item(s) and Event(s). Applications available in Information Science Programming and as a consequence also in Mathematics.  By using computers to model new existential relationships based on The Quantitative and Qualitative relationship and document them with Mathematics and Algorithms. 
    • Another application would be a purely mathematical one. Study the significance of numerology or just significance of numbers. Maybe numbers do have significance in themselves?
    • 1unit1 × 1unit1 => Qualc;  Also significant when existential time is considered. In this case there is a resultant Qualitative state, although when considered in a Numeric context only it would not said to be so.  This particular expression could have different use in Information Science Programming than the "non identity" expression mentioned above.
    • 2unit1 × 3unit1 => Cc
  • (N1 + N2 + N3) × (A + B + C)
  • A = Not A
  • 1 × 1 = > 1x
  • (A + B ) (A + B)
  • 1 + 1 + 1 + 1....+ NNx
  •  1 Sheep + 1 Ram ( Sheep + Not Sheep + Ram + Not Ram)
  • 1A + 1B => 1 (A + Not A + B + Not B)
  • ((A + Not A)1 / (B + Not B) 2 )× ((B + Not B)3  /  (A + Not A)4 )
  • 1c = 2 c = 3c ........=  ∞c
  • X1 + X2 + X3 = >  Not (X1 × X2 × X3)  × (X1 × X2 × X3) × (X1 + X2 + X3) /  Not (X1 × X2 × X3)  × (X1 × X2 × X3)
  • Every (a) = Any (a) = Some (a) = Non (a) + Every (b) = Any (b) = Some (b) = Non (b) =>  Gives unique qualitative result  for any System a and b.

 
A Case for a Numerology:
  1. Quantity and Quality never exist separately, Existentially
  2. Relative Co-Existentiality could provide a basis for Numerology.

Example(s):  1-7; The permutations of one through seven , or 1 Qual thru 7 Qual existential items/events, could provide an existential pattern........?
An expression that shows why/how any Quan Qual expression of an Item(s)/Event(s) can have only a limited Quantitative value.  Any expression of an Item(s)/Event(s) such as QuanCQualC must be the result of some factor of  QuanAQualA ×/QuanBQualB . Or,   QuanAQualA  + QuanBQualB.   So Quan C must be limited by it's prior Quantitative factor.  Remember any Item(s)/Event(s) is said to be unique in terms of it's existential Quantitative and Qualitative values. So for any N1×Apple  ×/ N2 × Orange => N3 × Fruit.  Or  N1×Apple  +  N2 × Orange => N3 × Fruit.  Note: This is existential Mathematics.

Author/Owner - Zim Olson     Top of Page