Thoughts on Government
I really don't have a philosophy of Government now. Just some thoughts on the subject after discussing this with a friend recently. A Government should be based on where the subject(s) have been, where they are now, where they want to go and don't want to go. The Government should also incorporate it's surroundings/environment into it's Conceptualization of itself. Most governments that I am aware of now, do not do this so much. They are primarily concerned with the State. Time is also poorly incorporated into today's Governments. This dynamic is added primarily in second or subsequent thoughts. Also with the Axiom that new Axioms can and will be found, All of the above and it's implementation(s) should be accessible to re evaluation.
New Thoughts on Government 2011
Looking at current and Historical thoughts on Governments within the mathematically structured System and/or Sub System paradigm, I think I reveal some of the existential sources of chronic strife with Government Concepts and their Applications. Many Governments, that I am aware of Historically and currently, could be said to be compromised of the following components.
-
A System Construct or Mathematical Construct of some Partial System Expression
-
Earthly Geographic Constructs.
-
Individual or given individual Constructs
Note these components are all characterized as some form of partial system expression. Which is a source of course of Constant misinformation as derived from Earthly utilization of the Knowledge Theory under the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil", or utilization or supposed ownership of knowledge through use of Partial System Expressions.
Examples, Historical and Current , of dilemmas resulting from this practice in knowledge are:
-
State vs. Federal Government issues. Partial System - Sub System constructs are confused and non issues result in un necessary conflict.
-
Geographic constructs are given attribute of a principal system or some principal system. They may be better characterized as simply Earthly parameters and not a source of Mathematics of a principal system and/or sub system.
-
Individuals or Individual constructs are confused. The role of individuals is manipulated as a construct or in misplaced ownership. As in a partial system/sub system expression.
-
The System or Mathematical Construct of any said Government, is not well thought out. That is to say information is omitted, ignored or not deemed irrelevant. The government is given ownership of this system, as some form of "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil". Limiting input and as a consequence output. Mathematically it is known that a poorly formed transformation can limit future incorporable information and limit the system of concern.
Of course, one could go on and on , on the ramifications of all this , Historically and currently. I have some more updates to do on this site and hope to come back to this soon.
I hope my work on Laws and Facts in the Expression / Formula section may be Helpful in this Exercise on Government
More Thoughts on System Sub System Mathematics and Government, in 2012
This exercise is a result of work on "The Least is the Greatest, and the Greatest is the Least" Paradox, found in the Zim Math Synopsis and Creative Axiom List. (Also see Diagram Below)
When a Government construct , System Z, expresses itself as some Z(A,B,C,D) = + - / *, and the population it "Serves" as some Z(A); Z(B); Z(C);Z(D); or as with the US Government f(A); f(B); f(C); f(D); a common function of a set of individuals. As opposed to some other possible expression such as : A(1,0); B(1,0); C(1,0); D(1,0); or A(X); B(X); C(X); D(X); or A(N); B(N); C(N); D(N); or A(Xx); B(Xx); C(Xx); D(Xx); System Z will become the "Least" or Least functional or powerful, and the Sub Systems A,B,C,D, the least empowered or empowered by System Z.
