Creative Calendar Sequences   Table of Contents

This calendar would be different than the solar calendar in that it could contain nested event(s)/item(s) and thus could contain Universal/Solar/Earthly/Personal/Quantum Item(s)/Event(s).  Functionality of a Calendar Item(s)/Event(s) could be determined with Zim Mathematics System Transformation mentioned above. None Item(s)/Event(s) would be an important additional feature of a Calendar. Every and None events/items would be important. Not just Any and Some events/items. This provides a new concept of  Time itself. Example: Every Universal/Some Universal/None Universal/Any Personal/Any Atomic .   Unions and Intersections of Items and/or Events within the System - Sub System model could enhance calendar options further.

The Non Equality Axiom    Table of Contents

No two distinct existential items (A or B) are known to be equal in terms of their Quantitative and Qualitative properties. No two item(s)/event(s) or their context can be said to be equal.  Not even the item(s) / event(s) and context of a Hydrogen atom or equal to another "Hydrogen atom" . Each item and event can be said to have multiple item(s) and event(s), thus explaining mathematically every day phenomena and Quantum phenomena as well. "Relativity" explains why items can no longer be considered by themselves, but are item(s)/event(s) together. This yields numerous Mathematical and every day applications. Examples are: 1. Any system said to be based on the system of equalities will  fail. 2. Any System to be said  based on equalities, can be made to work, function  (with at least  limits/constraints of "G" ) by application of a  existential system "G" as in example:  G (A(x), B(x), x ),  where x = any possible behavior. etc. The System "G" would experience change (delta) or cease to function as System "G" completely, but could not exist statically. Delta "G" cannot be Quantitatively and Qualitatively paramatized. Examining what Systems require for change would be useful. Such as resources required of a System to change. This would be as opposed to spending too many resources on building and maintaining a System..  The Human factor would/could be considered as within the System(s) of concern .

Other implications are  that for any expression of  A + B there is another working solution by some different System G where it can be shown there is always a   Non G (A(x), B(x), x )   for Any G (A(x), B(x), x ).  And statements of  Plurality or Generality would have different meaning and significance.

See Also Relationships & Their Barriers  in Mathematics Art &  Relation Constants  in Expression/Formulas section

Functions of Chaos - Applications for Disaster Response Management          Table of Contents

Explore operations that can exist in Chaos that don't function in other environments. Ie bottom up management (Non Person). Evaluating the System/God Transformation - Bottom Up. See  Tower of Babel - Math Art Game.  Also see  United we Stand....Divided we are Undefined only  topic in Creative Math. Forum. And  see Unsubordinate Fact  a new Mathematics Tool useful in Information Science Programming.....Where the product of two or more random item(s)/event(s) gives a qualitative result and possibly a Conservation of Information.

This could be an example of "Knowledge Synthesis", achieved when/where "all things possible are known" and that the only way to achieve new knowledge is to subtract Knowledge. "Knowing Everything" being a Human Condition.

A Mathematical Expression of Intelligent Systems could be one of a Transformation over time with a conservation of factored know/conditions. The System of Intelligence would be the "Source" of Transformation.

A general system or system of intelligence can be produced using  Unsubordinate Fact principle where the factoring of any quantitative components gives unique qualitative result producing new information required for a System or System of Intelligence and by the factoring of any given know/conditions ( As in ROM) giving a Conservation of Information while producing the new information:     

 Nx(t) × (Ny(t) × (Know A +....+ Know Z)) 

The Qualitative factor of the System/Intelligence may be provided by the nature of   Ny  or  Nx where y or x  could  = Homo. Sapiens,  Brain Neurons,  or some component of some other "System".  N would be some physical quantitative factor;  t = time

Note: f(chaos) = Every(x) ×/ Any(x)  ×/ Some(x)  ×/ Non(x)  ×  (Some (A) + Some (B) + Some (C)....) as shown in the Expression / Formula section has possible use in this application section of Disaster Response Management, I think.  Identifying and applying the missing system components and missing Items and /or Events could transform the chaotic situation to a situation of Critical Information and System Functionality.

 God A + God B + God C = God unit X      Table of Contents

Where A or B or C are Anything expressed in the context of God; Religion, concept, law, behavior; giving God unit X for any A or B or C. I feel this has more than Religious applications.   Where the Greater Context can be expressed in terms of  unit X making  calculations of various expressions of this type possible. Example: God (A) + God (-A) = God unit x; and See God Expressions  for other possibilities.

God is Love and their Mathematical Expression:      Table of Contents

In the New Testament in the Bible, it is said "God is Love"  or maybe God = Love. Here is my attempt at Mathematically substantiating this 'existential' phenomena.

I would like to show that the existential expression of all existential 'emotions' gives a unique expression of Love Cx  or a 'Love' Constant unit unknown.

E1 + E2 + E3 +...+ En => Love Cx.  This would be as the Bible states it and as how I interpret it, where Love is the resultant expression of all existential emotions.  A basic to Christian Belief......I am still trying to show and prove this is existentially true......(10/02/2009)  The expression immediately above as applied to a System would be said to give a condition of Unconditional Logic  and a  source or Order (See  Table of Contents).  Which could be said to be a definition of  Love.  As applied with a component of the Principal System it could be said to be a source of eternal system wide Love.  The correct definition of  system or principal system is a key to a correct Mathematical and existential statement.

Here are some implications of this statement and expression:

Love = (X1 + X2) / God; or  Love = (E1 + E2) / God;

1. Love = (X1 + X2 + X3 +.....+ Xn )/ God;

2. God × Love =  X1 + X2 + X3 +.....+ Xn

3.                      = Xx1  = Cx

4. God  = Cx / Love

5. God = Mankind / Love

 Definition Theory      Table of Contents   

Word Definition and particularly Biblical top down word definition can be given by the System / God Transformation where Every (word) */ Any (word) */ Some (word) */ Non (word) gives word meaning or definition functionality.  See Definition Theory in Math Art section where a typical word or otherwise definition is given by Qual (Definition) × QuanQual (Defined Item)  and the equivalent functionality given by Every (word A) × Any (word A ). A word definition functionality of the Bible for example could be given by additional use of  Some (word x) = Jesus's Life or spoken Life or behavior , and Non (word x) = Holy Spirit or what Jesus did not speak or did not behave.  Further illustrating the Non Functional component of Systems.

Word Math:  The reason why one word cannot define or describe everything  indicates some Definition dynamics.

Physics Constants       Table of Contents

These expressions may be helpful in interpreting physical relationships and constants:

g = mass/gravity

Every(g)= Any(g)=Some(g)=Non(g)  for Universe System

Every(g)*/ Any(g)*/Some(g)*/Non(g)  for Universe System-Sub System where System(g) ≠ Sub System(g) and/or Sub-System(g) ≠ Sub-System(g)

Was reading the Scientific American June 2007 issue , article "When Fields Collide".  Where an explanation of mass is explored.  Here is another explanation or "reason" for system of mass/gravity. ........ The different behavior components of any System would also show variations in the Gravitation force.  Identifying already Identified Physical forces that would fit these behavior descriptions is my next task (10/20/2008).

c = Speed of Light constant

Every(c)= Any(c)=Some(c)=Non(c)  for Universe System

Every(c)*/ Any(c)*/Some(c)*/Non(c)  for Universe System-Sub System where System(c) ≠ Sub System(c) and/or Sub-System(c) ≠ Sub-System(c)

&

t = Time  Shows relativity of Time?

Every(t)= Any(t)=Some(t)=Non(t)  for Universe System

Every(t)*/ Any(t)*/Some(t)*/Non(t)  for Universe System-Sub System where System(t) ≠ Sub System(t) and/or Sub-System(t) ≠ Sub-System(t)

or     t1 ×/ t2  = > Nt3  where any time system factored by another time system gives another system of time with a quantitative correlation. Per Unsubordinate Fact and Expression Constants.  Making the idea of a Creation Time seem more feasible, mathematically. A time system would be any existential item/event expressed as a function of time.

&

Every (f=m/d2) =  Any (f=m/d2) =  Some (f=m/d2) =  None (f=m/d2)   or  Every ((f=m/d2)t) =  Any ((f=m/d2)t) =  Some ((f=m/d2)t) =  None ((f=m/d2)t).... for Universe System, for example.

Every (f=m/d2) */  Any (f=m/d2) */  Some (f=m/d2) */  None (f=m/d2)  or  Every ((f=m/d2)t) */  Any ((f=m/d2)t) */   Some ((f=m/d2)t) */   None ((f=m/d2)t)   where the sub systems (whatever they are) are not equal in existential quantitative and qualitative terms

&

Every(Energy)= Any(Energy)=Some(Energy)=Non(Energy)  for Universe System AND / OR any Sub System, providing new forms of expressing Energy or Work.

Every(Energy)*/ Any(Energy)*/Some(Energy)*/Non(Energy)  for Universe System and / or Sub System where System(Energy) ≠ Sub System(Energy) and/or Sub-System(Energy) ≠ Sub-System(Energy)

Every(EnergyA) ×/ Any(EnergyA) ×/Some(EnergyA) ×/Non(EnergyA)   ×/  (Every(EnergyB) + Any(EnergyB) + Some(EnergyB) + Non(EnergyB));  Critical Energy of Sub System B by principal System Transformation of Energy A;  Note:  Partial System Components  and partial Items and/or Events can be used for similar results.

&

Non(B) ×/  Non(A)  ×/ Any(A)  ×/ Some(A} ×/ Every(A);  Anti Matter B  ×/  existential matter system A , New Energy mode???

A possible use of my Math Expression Constant found in the Table of Contents is to interpret the famous equation E = MC² further.  Energy = kg  (meters/seconds) ² = N × C  ,  N is some numeric component to a unique expression C of by the Existential Expression of any Existential Expression(s).  I am trying to come up with another interpretation of this with a Gravity expression. But I have come up with no additional information at this time ( 02-27-2008).

Also using the Math. Expression Constant:  Xc × Cx =  N × C;  Xc could be some Generality or General Function ( Fruit/ Object /XFuncntion unit constant), Cx could be  a discrete/existential function (Apple(A), Constant Function unit x). Showing a relationship between the General and the Specific in Quantitative and Qualitative values. This is a way to characterize a regular Physical Transformation

Phi Time Relationships      Table of Contents

Known Phi Time relationships are:  mass/gravity, Energy,  Light Speed, Fruit components (Apple, Pear, Orange....).  Other not so well documented phi time relationships are Quantum behavior, Prayer.  I propose that using my Math Expression Constant   and  the System/God Transformation and the Relational System Transformation and the mentioned System Components; Every(x), Some(x), Any(x), Non(x);  that these relationships and new ones can be further documented Mathematically.  See   Table of Contents

  "An expression of expressions gives a unique expression with a quantitative factor or correlation."  - Math Expression Constant

Any existential expression of  any item(s)/event(s) can be said to in fact exist in time. With a quantitative component.

The reason why I say the relationship of addition must exist in a phi time is that all item(s) and event(s) are said on this page, to be unique.  And a cumulative factor relationship does not exist among the specified  item(s) and event(s), but some other existential medium. Perhaps such as a mutual reference to some existential item/event as in NCt  .

Some Interesting Examples:

• Every(God) + Every (Man) + ....+ Every(x) = N × C

• Every(God) + Every (Man) +  Any(Man) + ....+ Every(x) = N × C

• Every(God) +  Any(Man) + ....+ Every(x) = N × C

• Non (A) + Non (B) + ..... + Non (Z) =  N × C

• Every (Atom A) + Any (Atom A) + Non (Atom A) = N × C

• Every (Matter A) + Non (Matter A) = N × C

• Every (mass/gravity) + Non (mass/gravity) = N × C

• Any (Energy) + Non (Energy) = N × C

• Some (Speed of Light) + Non (Speed of Light) = N × C

• Photon A + Photon B + Photon C = N × C

• Xc + Cx =  N × C;  Xc could be some Generality or General Function ( Fruit/Ojbect/Xc), Cx could be  a discrete/existential function (Apple(A), Cx). Showing a relationship between the General and the Specific in Quantitative and Qualitative values.

• Cx + Cx =  N × C;   Cx could be  a discrete/existential function (Apple(A), Cx). Showing a relationship of the Specific in Quantitative and Qualitative values. x could = 1 - N; C could be some known 'Apple' Function.

• Phi Time for Generalities instead of  existential and discrete Item(s)/Event(s): Showing an expression of Generalities equals another Generality and not a unique existential expression.

  •  N × Word  ≠ Words unit A + Words unit  B + Words unit  C ; A,B,C are Quantitative or Qualitative units.

    •  N × Word  ≠ Verbs + Nouns + ProNouns

  • X Word unit c = Words A + Words B + Words C ; A,B,C are Quantitative or Qualitative units.

    • X Word unit c = Word (Verbs) + Word (Nouns) + Word (ProNouns)

  • Gravity = Gravity A + Gravity B + Gravity C  (Gravity is seen as a generality here or phi time constant. Generalities => Generality See Induction)

  • N*Gravity or Force = Matter A + Matter B + Matter C  (Matter A-C etc is seen as an existential item/event,  Cumulative Truths => a  New Truth. See Deduction)

  • Communicated Sentence or (N×C ) = Word (A) + Word(B) + Word(C); (where Word A-C is existentially used item/event. Cumulative Truths => a  New Truth. )

• Other "Generality" Expressions (to be completed 03/11/2010)

• System as a function of a Sub-System.
• Matter as a Generality Expression:  Energy A + Energy B + Energy C = Mass ×  C2; Mass + Mass + Mass = Mass D (Mass D is another generality.) Where a Phi Time Relationship of Energy gives Mass. As in Critical Energy vs. Critical Mass.
• Gravity-Force/Matter as generalities and existential Item(s)/Event(s) in Gravity Expression:  m1 × m2 = N × F**2;  m**2/N = F**2;  m/N**2=F; Either m or F can be expressed as a generality or phi time existential relationship to make the expression work from both sides. M1 and m2 can be interpreted as both mass and force and thus equal to F**2 times math expression constant N.  (I see I need to work on this some more) See Bibliography item #8
  

• General Forces in Phi-Time:  Every(⁺A) ×/ Any(⁺B)  ×/ Some(⁺C)  ×/ None(⁺D)  ×/ Every(⁺A + ⁺ B + ⁺C + ⁺D)   ×/ Any (⁺A + ⁺ B + ⁺C + ⁺D)  ×/ Some (⁺A + ⁺ B + ⁺C + ⁺D) ×/ None (⁺A + ⁺ B + ⁺C + ⁺D)  ×/   Every(^-A) ×/ Any(^-B)  ×/ Some(^-C)  ×/ None(^-D)  ×/ Every(^-A + ^- B + ^-C + ^-D)   ×/ Any (^-A + ^- B + ^-C + ^-D)  ×/ Some (^-A + ^- B + ^-C + ^-D) ×/ None (^-A + ^- B + ^-C + ^-D)    ; Modeling with Sub-Systems gives new information "Constantly".

System(s) and their Components expressed in Phi Time matrix - Can be used to identify currently documented existential relationships ie, Gravity, Time (where the Systems are of Mass or Time) or identify undocumented existential relationships ie prayer or Quantum behavior where the systems Are Atomic or intellectual/existential. Or other uncharted existential relationships such as Non-Phi Time relationships etc.  This could be said to be a matrix model of all possible System(s) existential relationships/behavior. Sub groupings can also be used to identify more possible existential behavior.

Life or Life Creation Model ("Tree of Life")  And Saving by "Grace"    Table of Contents

Critical Information OR Life System Creation is as follows: Every(A)  ×/ Any(A)   ×/  Some(A)   ×/  Non(A)   ×/  (  Every(B) + Any(B) + Some(B) + Non(B)  );  Where System B components co-exist or come together in Phi Time Relationship supported by the component functionality of Principal systems or System A.  Necessary for ALL life, perhaps.  The above could be life creation for a one cell animal. For Humans the expression could be: 

 Every(A)  ×/ Any(A)   ×/  Some(A)   ×/  Non(A)   ×/  ((  Every(B) + Any(B) + Some(B) + Non(B)  +  Every(C) + Any(C) + Some(C) + Non(C))

For non permanent partners the expression might be:   Every(A)  ×/ Any(A)   ×/  Some(A)   ×/  Non(A)   ×/  ((  Every(B) + Any(B) + Some(B) + Non(B)  + Some(C)  )

Or  See: Tree of Life ( Judeo-Christian)  as opposed to Tree of Knowledge? see Table of Contents.

Note: A 'Barrier of Relations' could be caused by the existence of the following Expression:

Every(x) ×/ Any(x) ×/ Some(x) ×/ Non(x) × (Every(A) + Any(A) + Some(A) + Non(A));

I knew of the existence of this expression before. I just needed a metaphor to describe it.

An expression of a Non Barrier of Relationships may be the following:

Every(x) ×/ Any(x) ×/ Some(x) ×/ Non(x) / (Every(x) + Any(x) + Some(x) + Non(x)).

.....The difference between the two expressions is that one System-Sub System is factored and the other is a principal system by proportion of a System expressed in phi time. Non Barrier relationship could indicate the release of some sort of 'Energy'. Or Informational force or bond. Perhaps I need a better metaphor for this expression also.

........The existence of Co-Existences is of interest here.  Where does Coexistence exist in a phi Time Relationship.  How does an  expression of  co-existence take place or  occur.  What is the cause/effect of Coexistence? In a System and/or Sub System? See Unconditional Logic in Table of Contents  .  In a System there is Unconditional Logic but no cause/effect, ....in the Sub Systems there is cause/effect but only finite/axiomatic logic.  Phi Time Relationships (Unconditional logic) exist in Systems but not their Sub Systems.  A Sub System expression as a System might give a  form of  Unconditional Logic or a Phi Time Relationship.

Being Saved by "Grace"  Expressing oneself with a component of the  Principle System can transform ones functionality and thus you can be "Saved by Grace" (As found in the New Testament of the Bible).

Critical Information      Table of Contents 

Using my Math Expression Constant and System/God  Transformations and Cumulative Phi Time principles.  See:  Table of Contents  .  I came up with  Critical Information Expression(s) below.

1. N × Fruit  = Apple + Pear + Orange

2. f  (N × Fruit / Apple + Pear + Orange) unit x1 =>  Critical Information.    Phi time gives a constant. c/c = > c? or Fruit / Fruit = Fruit. Or this could be another form of expression constant found  in Math Art at X/X * X/X = X.

3. Every(A) + Any(A) + Some(A) + Non(A) = 1 × God  where A is the Principal System;

4. or for a System-Sub System: Every(A)  ×/ Any(A)   ×/  Some(A)   ×/  Non(A)   ×/  (  Every(B) + Any(B) + Some(B) + Non(B)  ); Where A is the principle System and B is the Sub System.  This is the complete expression and can be expressed with the various system components instead. See System Relational Transformation.

Reference Mobile      Table of Contents

This Application concept employs a System Sub-System modeling structure with corresponding existential properties/concepts to model general Transportation principles.   Hopefully expanding on the Transportation models currently known and used.

Components of Systems are used within Math Expression Constant principles in different Phi Time relationships.   See  Table of Contents  . Giving meaning to the following  sample expression:

Any(B1) + Any(B2) + Any(C1) = N  × Any(D1); Bn are sub-systems to C1 system and D1 is some resultant system of the left side of the expression; N can be interpreted as a 'directional' vector.  The left side of the expression can be interpreted as two points of concern within a Transportation mode/environment  C1.  The components of the System(s) can be substituted within a System Relational Transformation.  Unions and/or Intersections of System-Sub Systems modeled as Item(s) and/or Event(s) can give new conceptual frame work to the current Transportations concepts

This 'Reference Mobile' concept was inspired by by work done in the following Expression / Formula section and also in the Math Art section.

Earth Temperature      Table of Contents

Earth Temperature functionality can be given by the following system functionality expressions:

 Every(  Earth Temp ) ×/  Any (   Earth Temp ) ×/  Some (  Earth Temp ) ×/  Non (   Earth Temp )

or

Every(   Earth Temp ) =  Any (  Earth Temp ) =  Some (   Earth Temp ) =  Non (  Earth Temp )

or

Every( - B + B) ×/  Any ( - B + B ) ×/  Some ( - B + B ) ×/  Non ( - B + B )

Every( - B + B) =  Any ( - B + B ) =  Some ( - B + B ) =  Non ( - B + B )

Where B = Earth System Function Temperature;    -B = Greenhouse Earth Temp. function......Solve for +B for Every, Any, Some and Non system components.

  Unconditional Logic       Table of Contents

Unconditional Logic in Information Space, System and/or Sub System Un Conditional Logic and Phi Time Space System and/or Sub System Un Conditional Logic Forces in Phi Time Space System and/or Sub System

This rationale gives different results depending on what it is used to model. At left is an illustration of "Unconditional Logic".   When this rationale is used to model an existential system we can see order. When used to model a System - Sub System paradigm we seem to get "reasons" for chaos. Stay tuned for developments on this concept.  And see the outline below. This can be helpful in assigning rationale to Molecular item(s)/event(s) Interference in a Molecular System or System-Sub System for purpose of testing etc. would require their re definition and re assignment of rationale .  The Sub Function constructs, for example, may  have to be reworked to give System functionality under some rationale (Matrix Algebra for example) or the Unconditional Logic rationale. Makes sense of Apple + Apple = 2 Apple(s) in phi time system Gives rationale for Number line in phi time Identify sub system(s) in Defense System? See Barrier of Relations in Math Art Section. The role of Unconditional Logic can be seen in "Love" Systems, and Systems and Sub Systems. I think. "Explanation" of Phi Time Relationships such as Physical Force Constants, Informational Relationships and other Phi Time Relationships May explain the apparent difference in behavior of Time between System and Sub System paradigms. Unconditional Logic System - Sub System => Chaos => "Reason(s)" for Chaos &/or Stupidity. Because  System - Sub System (Reason Space) always growing/changing => System =>Order => "Reason(s)" for Intelligence; A System or a System ordered after time or the Reason Space for the System itself. This gives a way to discover chaos in a system of order, and order in a System-Sub System of  chaos

Science Knowledge States and  Possible Mind State Dynamics      Table of Contents

I believe the quest of Science is not complete without a futuristic and co-existing plot of  the role and dynamics of the Mind with Scientific development.  Science has held objectivity the King of knowledge, but I think Subjectivity has an important role in the development of knowledge. In other words the 'Who' component in What,  When, Why, Where, How, and WHO! I have a few formulas which I developed in God Expressions and God's IQ in the Expression / Formula section  which will help illustrate this relationship.

(Mind A / Matter)1 => Man or Inner IQ or Psychology; (Matter / Mind B)1 => God or some external IQ; (Mind A / Matter1-N / Mind B)C => Chaos; Mind A / (Matter / Mind B)1 => Man X; (Mind A / Matter)1 / Mind B =>  God X; (Mind A / Matter 1 / Mind B)1 => Order/Science; (Mind X / Matter A ) 1 = > Hypothesis; (Mind A / Matter A) + (Mind B / Matter B) = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / (Matter A + Matter B) = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / Constant ( A + B ) unit x = > ( Mind A + Mind B) / Constant ( A + Not A + B + Not B) unit x = > Basis for Discussion and Compromise. Or a "Apple/Fruit" Transformation; Matter A or Matter B could be an Psychological/Mathematical assessment.

Venn Diagram of God, Matter, and Knowledge.

Note: A "God's IQ" can be termed as some external IQ.  With time factored into these expressions at strategic points interesting dynamics can be uncovered. As I said above, the principal point I am making is that the state of knowledge of Science is not complete without an understanding of the corresponding role of the current and future states of the Mind. And can there ever be a Universal Standard for experience?

Information Concepts and the Dictionary      Table of Contents

I feel there is no need to organize the standard dictionary as it currently is.  More power and Humanization of Languages can be given by changing the format, organization, structure of the standard language dictionary. Some simple Information concepts can be used to start such a project. Such as:

1. Cross reference word items with equivalent Thesaurus items and their definitions.
2. Definitions of Hyperbole, figures of speech and other Human contexts of expression can be used to give additional definitions
3. Artistic representations of Words can be used to give further definitions. Drawings, cartoons, poems, Stories, Thought experiments in different context, words in different context/sequences.
4. Different Quantitative and/or Qualitative context of word definition(s) can be used as examples.
5. Definitions with fill in the blank options
6. Truth Table Definitions, Hierarchal Definitions, Flow Charted Definitions, Boolean Definitions.
7. Possible new words can be suggested.
8. Nonsensical  words can be suggested with the above word definition formats given
9. Definitions can be given that have no words yet.
   
10. lazy Brown Fox jumped swiftly(0/1) over+Δ1x the(1) fence1/1........
11. Applying the System/God Transformation to individual words is of interest.  Note the context of a  word A, Every(Word A) does not equal the context of  a / the principle System , Every (A).  Not sure why except each System-Sub System is said to be unique.  Thus absolute truth or meaning is non achievable for any symbol.  And the idea of an implied greater context as in math expressions also cannot achieve absolute meaning or truth.  The only way to achieve greater meaning of an expression or symbol is by expression with another symbol or expression.  Maybe a Universal expression could be tried for this experiment.   Example:  The functional context of the microprocessor of a computer is not the same as the functional context of the same existential computer.
12. ......... .........

Zim Math Farms      Table of Contents

The conceptual possibility of  Zim Math Farms where all System Components were nurtured and grown in a variety of forms (farms) .  Using the Principal Components in partial or full transformations and also utilizing the Math. Expression Constant Principle outlined in the introduction to this section (see Table of Contents). And see the Bibliography in Application section for inspiration to this idea.

Politics & Political Expressions      Table of Contents

The Art of Politics at times takes some interesting forms to myself.  Speeches, Campaigns promises and other statements and expressions.  Here are some sample expressions in the campaign  that I perceive from my Television and Internet. Any(+) / Every(+ -);   Some(+) / Every(-);  Every(A) ×  (Some (A) + Some (B) + Some(C));    Some(Who) × (Every(Who) + Any(who));  Some(Who) × Any(What X); What I am trying to say here, is  that mostly partial truths or partial transformations of truths are used in these political expressions. And although results can be achieved,  the expressions are poorly formed and don't mean much. Partial expressions, are of course, used often in our lives. These may be part of our intellectual processes to give us an understanding but should not be substituted for 'Truth'. And should not be a substitute for how things 'work' as opposed to  how they can be made to work.  These political expressions do not give us the full picture.

Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil     Table of Contents  

This is a Mathematical interpretation of the Biblical verse(s):

Genesis 2:17 "But of the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil, though shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest there of thou shalt surely die."

I interpret this in reference to my System/God Transformation: Every(x) ×/ Any(x) ×/ Some(x) ×/ None(x)  which gives understanding to all things including good and evil.  Note that the above Transformation is also a top/down Mathematical tree. From Function to Sub Functions. Or System to Sub-Systems.  I don't think the Old Testament indicates the Some(x) or Non(x) system behavior components but that there is reference to these in the New Testament.  The System Relational Transformation (Every(x) = Any(x) = Some(x) = None(x) ) is  part of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in the New Testament but not the Old Testament.  I see indirect evidence of the System Relational Transformation in the New Testament giving documentation of the Resurrection and subsequent Life after Death.  Evaluation of  a System and/or Sub System within the System God Transformation  may make this phenomena possible. Where the only known way to solve the Life expression of Jesus is to AND the expression with the Non value of the Jesus Life expression (His death) for the various system behavioral components. See solving Constant unit unknown expressions in:  Table of Contents  . Also the varied behavioral components of  each system makes the manner of achieving this possible in different ways. The Non Functional component of the Principle System could result in Jesus' Birth and his acquiring the "Holy Spirit" later in his life. The Co-existence or Cumulative relationship with this resultant system could give access to the long forbidden "Tree of Life" .The use of the System/God Transformation varies on what "Tree" or System it is used to Transform. See: Tree of Life ( Judeo-Christian) And maybe some other parameters I am not thinking of now. I think so. As mentioned in other categories of the Application section this "Knowledge Tree" could explain unusual behavior such as Quantum behavior. And the partial use of the System Transformations at some level could explain the phenomena of Para Normal behavior or "Magic"  that has been statistically verified.

Tree time is finite/axiomatic and has limited result.  Where  Every(Time A) + Every (Time B) + Every (Time C) = Every(Time) unit x. Or:  Every(Time A) + Every (Time B) + Every (Time C)  ≠  N × C ; for non-finite Time.  For finite/axiomatic Time:    Every(Time1) + Every (Time2) + Every (Time3)  = N × C . See Phi Time Relationships.  And depending on what you Transform your results will vary, of course.  Tree Knowledge - Math Art

Logical Derivation of the Universe     Table of Contents  

Creation modeled as Items and Events of a System and maybe Sub Systems. This is as opposed to a Item/Event or Cause/Effect model of Creation such as with the Big Bang Theory. This may imply a Logical Derivation of the Universe as opposed to the cause and effect model of an Item and Event.

Definology - A Definition Algorithm      Table of Contents  

A Definition Algorithm as applied to non qualified objects such as 1 and/or 0 as expressed as a function of the basic operations (+, -, /, *) which are expressed as systems. For example: f(1,0) = + -  /  * .  The relationship of Qualitative values to this expression are of interest.  Mathematically and Existentially.

System Behavioral Component Summary      Table of Contents

An Original State  - f(1,0)  = + - / ×  Table of Contents  

I came up with this expression and its use when developing my Math Art Game:  System-Sub System Game.  This relationship can be expressed in a Venn Diagram, where f(1) is the functional context of a system, f(1 + 0) is the functionality of the Object System, and f(0) is the Non Functional component of the system.  The functional intersection of these system components is said to give the source of 'truth'.  Or when the intersection is a sub function or sub set of the system components it can be characterized as a typical and mathematical f(x).  When the intersection is a complete set of all the system components, or otherwise expressing a system, the intersection is said to be a source of truth.  .....When the intersection is a sub set or sub function of the other system components, the function is always 'finite/limited'. Also note:  The similarity to the analogy in Genesis in the Bible that the 'Forbidden Fruit' is located at the center of 'God's' garden.  The application or expression of a sub set or sub function  of the system could be said to start the sequence of events leading to a sub system tree.

"Original State" Continued....Remember, currently I am modeling all Objects as Items/Events with the possibility of Mathematically considering only partial expressions such as Item(s) and/or Event(s), or only partial system expressions, ie expressions of only part of the System Behavioral components.  This could effect the given total existential expressions. Also we  must consider the possibility of Time, Time Sequences or Dynamics, or 'Time/Space' relationships. For example:  Looking at a Clock as a Item/Event(s) expression and Space as a Item(s)/Event expression.  The Qualification or further Qualification of these objects would present new dynamic(s).  Fitting this into the above Venn diagram illustration within my System - Sub System model is my current challenge to date. Considering a Principal System of Time/Space and sub functions of Time/Space may be a good way to start this problem (06-08-2010).

Zim Mathematics Final Creativity Exam

Table of Contents

 Bibliographic Resources   Table of Contents  

1. Holy Bible

2. 2nd Law of Thermal Dynamics

 3. "Murphy's Law"   

 4. "....because God is Love"  I John 4:8

 5.   " A New Kind of Science" by Stephen Wolfram  mentions briefly the existence of Mathematical  Relational Transformations. The book was given to me by my Nephew Anand Patil for Christmas 2003.

6. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: on E=mc2  : E (joules or kg·m²/s²) = m (kilograms) multiplied by (299,792,458 m/s)2.

7.Tree of Life (Judeo-Christian) -  Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

8. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Newton's Gravitation; F=G*m1m2/r2,   Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on Newton's Gravitation; f=mg

9.. "The Great Courses of History of Science, Antiquity to 1700" by Professor Lawrence M. Principe of John Hopkins University. Part 2 of    3.   The Teaching Company , 2002. Lecture 20, 'The Science of Creation'.  This lecture reported that Thierry of the School of Chartres during the 12th Century,  stated that there are four causes to anything: God the Creator, God the Son, The Holy Spirit, and the essence of matter or the creation itself. And that this is the basis of all knowledge........This demonstrates prior background work regarding my System/God Transformation and The System Relational Transformation.

10. Wikipedia Encyclopedia - Inductive Reasoning

11. Wikipedia Encyclopedia Deductive Reasoning

12. On January 5, 2010; with Jim and Damian in our Philosophy discussion group, we had just finished listening to "The Great Courses" made by the Teaching Company on 'Exploring Roots of Religion'.  This particular lesson was on 'Stonehenge'.  We were having a little difficulty finding things about the lesson to discuss, so I suggested we think of what kind of 'Stonehenge' would we like to create to represent all our known beliefs/knowledge at this time .  I suggested we find something to incorporate all plants, animals, science, religion, and state(s) of the World on five acres.  And I then asked for suggestions on this. Jim suggested a 'farm'.  And that is when I cam up with the idea of Zim Math Farms.

 Applications Page 1       Applications Page 2      Applications Table of Contents

 

Author/Owner - Zim Olson            Top of Page